Interaction of human dendritic cell receptor DEC205/CD205 with keratins

DEC205 (CD205) is one of the major endocytic receptors on dendritic cells and has been widely used as a receptor target in immune therapies. It has been shown that DEC205 can recognize dead cells through keratins in a pH-dependent manner. However, the mechanism underlying the interaction between DEC205 and keratins remains unclear. Here we determine the crystal structures of an N-terminal fragment of human DEC205 (CysR∼CTLD3). The structural data show that DEC205 shares similar overall features with the other mannose receptor family members such as the mannose receptor and Endo180, but the individual domains of DEC205 in the crystal structure exhibit distinct structural features that may lead to specific ligand binding properties of the molecule. Among them, CTLD3 of DEC205 adopts a unique fold of CTLD, which may correlate with the binding of keratins. Furthermore, we examine the interaction of DEC205 with keratins by mutagenesis and biochemical assays based on the structural information and identify an XGGGX motif on keratins that can be recognized by DEC205, thereby providing insights into the interaction between DEC205 and keratins. Overall, these findings not only improve the understanding of the diverse ligand specificities of the mannose receptor family members at the molecular level but may also give clues for the interactions of keratins with their binding partners in the corresponding pathways.

DEC205 (CD205) is one of the major endocytic receptors on dendritic cells and has been widely used as a receptor target in immune therapies.It has been shown that DEC205 can recognize dead cells through keratins in a pH-dependent manner.However, the mechanism underlying the interaction between DEC205 and keratins remains unclear.Here we determine the crystal structures of an N-terminal fragment of human DEC205 (CysRCTLD3).The structural data show that DEC205 shares similar overall features with the other mannose receptor family members such as the mannose receptor and Endo180, but the individual domains of DEC205 in the crystal structure exhibit distinct structural features that may lead to specific ligand binding properties of the molecule.Among them, CTLD3 of DEC205 adopts a unique fold of CTLD, which may correlate with the binding of keratins.Furthermore, we examine the interaction of DEC205 with keratins by mutagenesis and biochemical assays based on the structural information and identify an XGGGX motif on keratins that can be recognized by DEC205, thereby providing insights into the interaction between DEC205 and keratins.Overall, these findings not only improve the understanding of the diverse ligand specificities of the mannose receptor family members at the molecular level but may also give clues for the interactions of keratins with their binding partners in the corresponding pathways.

DEC205 (CD205 or Ly75
) is an endocytic receptor highly expressed on the dendritic cells with antigen-presenting function (1)(2)(3) and has been widely used as a receptor target in immune therapies (4,5).DEC205 belongs to the mannose receptor family, which also includes mannose receptor (MR) (6), PLA2R (7), Endo180 (8), and FcRY (9).MR family members are type I transmembrane proteins with a large extracellular portion, a transmembrane helix, and a short cytoplasmic region (7).Their ectodomains contain an N-terminal cysteine-rich domain (CysR), a fibronectin type II domain (FnII), and eight (ten for DEC205) C-type lectin-like domains (CTLDs) (7,10).Previous data have shown that although the MR family members might share similar structural features (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), they have shown different ligand binding specificities (18).For example, the CysR domain of MR is able to bind 4-SO 4 -GalNAc (19), the FnII domains of MR and Endo180 can recognize collagen specifically (6,(20)(21)(22), but the binding of 4-SO 4 -GalNAc and collagen has not been found for DEC205 (23).Instead, DEC205 could mediate the internalization of phosphorothioated cytosine-guanosine (CpG) oligonucleotides (24), which is a widely used vaccine adjuvant (25).The functional studies of DEC205 show that it can act as a receptor for dead cells (13,26) and may recognize dead cells through cellular keratins in a pH-dependent manner (27), as acidification usually occurs during the event of apoptosis (28)(29)(30)(31), but the mechanism of the interaction between DEC205 and keratins remains unclear.Likewise, both Endo180 and PLA2R do not show binding activities with keratins (27), suggesting that despite having similar structural features, the ligand binding properties and mechanisms of MR family members are rather diverse.
Cellular keratins are assembled into intermediate filaments (IFs), which are one of the major components of the cytoskeletal network in higher eukaryotes (32,33) and can serve as scaffolds for maintaining the mechanical properties of cells and tissues.Keratins usually contain a central rod domain of α-helical segments separated by short linker regions.The rod is flanked by nonhelical head and tail domains with glycine-rich sequences at the amino and carboxyl termini, respectively (32,34).Previous data have shown that keratins can be cleaved by caspases during apoptosis and generate fragments as dead cell markers (35,36), which have been used in clinical diagnosis for some diseases (37,38).Unfortunately, although a number of keratin-binding partners have been identified in the past decades (34), the mechanisms for the interactions are largely unknown.Current data suggest that the C-terminal tail of keratins might be a favorable region for some receptors (34), but whether it is a universal binding target needs further investigation.
Here we characterize the interaction of DEC205 with keratins by combining structural studies as well as mutagenesis and biochemical assays and identify a binding motif on keratins for DEC205, which may provide mechanistic insights into the keratin recognition by the receptors.

Crystal structure of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205
Previous studies have shown that DEC205 recognizes keratin tails through its N-terminal CysRCTLD3 fragment at acidic pH, and CysR and CTLD3 are the two domains that might be involved in keratin recognition (13).To investigate the structure of the CysRCTLD3 (residues M1-S627) fragment, we expressed the fragment in insect cells and the purified protein was applied for crystallization screening.Crystals were obtained in 0.2 M Sodium Citrate with 20% PEG3350 around neutral pH (pH 6.5-7.4).X-ray diffraction data were collected and showed two crystal forms, one in space group C2 and the other in space group P1.The structures of the two crystal forms were solved by molecular replacement using the crystal structures of MR (PDB entry 6INN and 5XTS) as the search models and refined to 2.79 Å and 3.35 Å resolution, respectively (Table 1).The structures of the CysRCTLD3 fragment show a C-shaped conformation in both crystal forms and they are quite similar with the r.m.s.deviation of C α atoms of 0.89 Å (Fig. 1, A and B).In P1 crystals, a homodimer of the fragment forms in one asymmetric unit (Fig. 1C), where the dimeric interface is contributed by the interactions of CysRCTLD1 and CTLD3 (Fig. 1C).The CysRCTLD2 region of DEC205 has an L-shaped conformation that is also found in the crystal structures of MR and Endo180 (Fig. 1D) (15,39) and the C-shaped conformation of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205 is similar to that of MR at acidic condition (Fig. 1D) (17).The crystal structure of the CysRCTLD3 fragment is also consistent with the cryoEM structure determined recently (16), which shows that DEC205 adopts a compact lemniscate structure with two concentrated rings of CTLDs at acidic pH and can form tetramers at basic environment (16) (Fig. 1E).Structural superpositions show that the crystal structure has a r.m.s.deviation of C α atoms of 1.5 Å with the cryoEM structure determined at the basic condition and the r.m.s.deviation of C α atoms increases to 4.9 Å when superimposed with the cryoEM structure at the acidic condition (Fig. 1E).Within the fragment, the CysRCTLD2 region is relatively rigid with a r.m.s.deviations of C α atoms of 1.2 Å and CTLD3 has a rotation of about 35 degrees as pH changes (Fig. 1E), which is analogous to the pH-dependent conformational change identified for the N-terminal fragment of MR (17).In addition, the AlphaFold model of the CysRCTLD3 fragment also shows that CTLD3 has an orientational change with the crystal structure (Fig. S1).The dimeric interface of the CysRCTLD3 fragment found in the crystals is also similar to that in the cryoEM structure determined at basic pH (16) (Fig. 1C), suggesting that DEC205 may dimerize on the cell surface, which might be relevant to ligand recognition.

The ligand-binding properties of DEC205
The structure of the CysR domain of DEC205 has a trefoil shape, similar to the CysR domains of MR and Endo180 (Fig. 2A) (15,39).The CysR domain of MR has a binding pocket for 4-SO 4 -GalNAc involving residues N118, N121, Y130, L135, and W136.Among them, residues L135 and W136 are located on an α-helix and form hydrogen bonds with the sulfate group of the ligand (15,17).By contrast, the residues L135 and W136 of MR are replaced by residues S137 and D138 from a loop region of DEC205 (Fig. 2A), and other residues such as N118, N121, and Y130 of MR are substituted by the residues A124, K126, and I133 of DEC205 (Fig. 2A), thereby losing the binding activity with 4-SO 4 -GalNAc (23).
The structure of the FnII domain of DEC205 is also similar to that of MR and Endo180, consisting of two β-sheets and two conserved disulfide bonds (Fig. 2B).It has been shown that the FnII domains from MR and Endo180 can recognize collagen and have similar collagen-binding grooves (15,39).However, the aromatic residues (F174 and Y208 for MR; Y193 and F227 for Endo180) that might be important for collagen recognition are replaced by I175 and I208 in DEC205 (Fig. 2B), respectively, which may account for the loss of collagen binding activity of DEC205 (40).Interaction of DEC205/CD205 with keratins The structures of CTLD1 and CTLD2 of DEC205 exhibit typical CTLD fold (7), and the two domains are associated with each other with a hydrophobic interface as well as hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2D), suggesting that they might be tightly associated with each other, which is similar to MR and Endo180 (15,39).The CTLD3 of DEC205 has a long linker with CTLD2 and, therefore, may be more flexible than CTLD1 and CTLD2, which is also analogous to MR (Fig. 1D) (15).Notably, the structure of the CLTD3 of DEC205 is different from the conventional CTLD fold with two unique loop regions (loop 1 and loop 2) (Fig. 2C).Loop 1 (residue E521-C528) replaces a conserved α-helix in the conventional CTLDs, and loop 2 (residue T573-A592) becomes much longer and partially missing in the crystal structure (Fig. 2C).Therefore, CTLD3 appears to be unique among the known CTLDs in the MR family.In fact, previous studies have indicated that CTLD3 might play a role in the ligand recognition of DEC205 (13,26,27), which may correlate with its unique structural features.
To validate the potential glycine-rich sequences identified above, we checked the tail region of keratin 1 (K1-T1, E490-R644), which had been shown to be able to bind DEC205 (27), and found that K1-T1 did not contain the binding sequences of K10 identified above, but it had similar glycinerich sequences such as K1-T2 (I512-G521: ISGGGSRGGG) and K1-T3 (G532-G541 and G560-G569: GSGGGSYGSG) (Fig. 4A).Then we expressed and purified these peptides for ELISA and flow cytometry.The results showed that both K1-T2 and K1-T3 could bind the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205 and also inhibit the interaction between the CysRCTLD3 fragment and dead cells (Fig. 4, B and C), suggesting that these glycine-rich sequences are important for the interactions with DEC205.

The keratin binding motif for DEC205
According to the sequences obtained from the tails of K10 and K1 that had binding activities with DEC205, it appears that XGGGX might be a core motif of the binding peptides, where X are the non-glycine residues and preferred to be polar residues such as S, H or Y (Fig. 4A).Then we generated a number of point mutations (K10-T10-Mn) regarding the X residue on peptide K10-T10 for binding assays (Fig. 5A).ELISA data showed that mutants K10-T10-M1 and K10-T10-M2 had reduced binding activities with DEC205 when an R was introduced in the motif (Fig. 5B), but they still could inhibit the interaction of keratin with DEC205 (Fig. 5C).By contrast, when X residues were replaced by G, V, or E, the resulting peptides K10-T10-M3, K10-T10-M4 and K10-T10-M5 lost binding affinity with DEC205 (Fig. 5, B-E), suggesting that non-polar or negatively charged residues were unfavorable in the motif.Moreover, when the three glycines in the motif were substituted by E, V, and W in peptides K10-T10-M6, K10-T10-M7, and K10-T10-M8, respectively (Fig. 5A), the peptides showed no binding activities with DEC205, suggesting that these glycines are indispensable for the recognition (Fig. 5, D and E).
To further validate the XGGGX motif, we generated a set of peptides, K10-T10-M9 to M13, by changing the number of glycines between the X residues from one to six (Fig. 5A).The flow cytometry results showed that only K10-T10, which had three glycines between the X residues, could block the binding of DEC205 with dead cells, whereas other peptides that had different numbers of glycines in between revealed no inhibitory effect (Fig. 5F), suggesting three glycines are crucial for the interaction with DEC205.
In addition, previous mass spectrometry data showed that DEC205 could pull down a number of cellular keratins such as K1, K2, K3, K5, K6, K9, K10, K13, K14, K16, and K79, where K1, K10, K9, and K2 had higher counts in the pulldown list (27).Indeed, the sequence search results showed that the XGGGX motif can be found in the tail regions of many keratins (some are in the head regions, such as K13, K14, K16, and K79) (41), including those identified by the pull-down assays (Fig. 4D).And among them, K1, K10, K9, and K2 contained more copies of the motif in the tail regions (Fig. 4D), supporting the importance of this motif for DEC205 recognition.

Recognition of keratins by DEC205
Although the CysRCTLD3 fragment is crucial for keratin binding (13, 27), both crystal and cryoEM structures ( 16) do Interaction of DEC205/CD205 with keratins not provide obvious clues for the potential binding site for keratins.Previous data have suggested that the CysR domain and CTLD3 might interact with each other at acidic conditions, and residue H129 on the CysR domain was important for keratin recognition (Fig. 5G) (13,27).However, both crystal and cryoEM structures show that H129 is pointing Interaction of DEC205/CD205 with keratins outward and away from CTLD3, and the intra-molecular interaction between the CysR domain and CTLD3 would be difficult due to geometric hindrance (Fig. 1C).Nevertheless, the interaction between the CysR domain and CTLD3 may occur in an inter-molecular fashion.To examine the possibility, we calculated the surface electrostatic potential of the CysR domain and CTLD3 at different pH (42,43).The results showed that the surface region of CTLD3 around loop 1 and loop 2 described above (Fig. 2C) is negatively charged at both pH 7.4 and pH 6.0, but the surface around H129 of the CysR domain is negatively charged at pH 7.4 and becomes positively charged at pH 6.0, implying that the two regions may be able to interact with each other at acidic condition (Fig. 6A), as suggested by the previous biochemical results (13), and a similar mechanism has been proposed for the pH-dependent interaction of MR (17).As described above, CTLD3 of DEC205 differs significantly from the typical CTLD fold, where loop 1 (E521-C528) replaces a conventional α-helix of CTLD and results in a much longer and flexible loop 2 (T573-A592) in the domain (Fig. 2C).To examine whether this unique structural feature is correlated with keratin binding, a deletion mutant of the CysRCTLD3 fragment, where a portion of loop 2 (T573-S584) of CTLD3 was removed, was constructed and it almost lost binding activity with dead cells (Fig. 5G).And when the deletion was recovered with a GS-rich sequence (SGGGSSGAGSSS), the fragment regained binding activity with dead cells (Fig. 5G), suggesting that loop 2 might be involved in the interaction with keratins.Furthermore, we tested the potential interaction of DEC205 with keratins by inputting the sequences of the CysRCTLD3 fragment and K10-T10 into AlphaFold (44)(45)(46)(47)(48), the resulting model showed that the keratin fragment K10-T10 bound predominantly on loop 2 of CTLD3 (Figs. 6B and S1), supporting the mutagenesis data.But how pH and the CysR domain may affect the keratin recognition as well as the binding details still need to be clarified with further evidence at molecular level.

Discussion
Keratins are one of the major cytoskeletal components and evidence has shown that keratins could be processed during apoptosis and act as markers for dead cells (27,36,49), which is analogous to other cytoskeleton components such as actin or spectrin that can be recognized by the immune receptors during cell death (50)(51)(52).Although the head and tail regions have the main sequence diversity among keratins (34), the GS-rich sequences are found in the heads and tails of many keratins, and recently it has been proposed that they may be involved in phase separation and participate in multiple physiological and pathological processes (53,54).The structural prediction by AlphaFold shows that the keratin tails are rather flexible without secondary structures (55), which may favor the interactions with DEC205 or other binding partners (34).
Previous studies have shown that keratins can bind to microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecule (MSCRAMM) called clumping factor B (ClfB), and ClfB may bind a peptide from the tail of keratin 10 with a GSSGXG motif through a dock-lock-latch model (56), where the linear peptide inserts between the N2 and the N3 domain of ClfB and form a β-sheet with N3 (56,57).Here our evidence suggests that both CTLD3 and the CysR domain of DEC205 may be involved in recognizing keratins, and the AlphaFold prediction shows that the keratin peptide with XGGGX motif binds mainly on loop 2 of CTLD3, which is consistent with the mutagenesis data and previous results (13,26,27).But the role of the CysR domain and how pH may affect the binding still need further investigation.In addition, previous reports have shown that oligomerization could be a common feature for the MR family members which may correlate with ligand recognition (40,(58)(59)(60).Recent cryoEM data also suggest that DEC205 may form dimers or tetramers, which might be relevant to CpG binding (16).Similarly, the dimerization or oligomerization of DEC205 may also promote the binding of keratins.
The structure of the N-terminal fragment of DEC205 shows similar features with MR and Endo180 (15,17,39), suggesting the evolutionary relations among the family members; however, the structural details of the individual domains are rather different.The 4-SO 4 -GalNAc binding pocket of the CysR domain and the collagen-binding groove of the FnII domain are both modified in DEC205, therefore losing the affinities for the ligands (18,19,23).Early evidence has shown that CTLD3 of DEC205 could be involved in recognizing ligands during apoptosis and necrosis (26) and subsequent data suggest that it might be important for keratin binding (13,27), which might correlate with the unique structural features of CTLD3.Therefore, the distinct structural details of the MR family members may contribute to the diverse ligand-binding properties of the receptors.
It has been shown that keratins are associated with more than 60 human disorders and could work as diagnostic markers for various diseases (37,61).For example, overexpressed, modified, or aggregated keratins are found in several kinds of malignant cells (37), and keratins may also serve as markers for cell or tissue injury and inflammatory and immune responses (62).Therefore, as a scavenging receptor against keratins, DEC205 may have advantages in the clearance of damaged or dead cells in these cases and provide opportunities to develop biomaterials or peptide-fusing antigens based on the binding motif targeting dendritic cells for antigen delivery and presentation.

Protein expression and purification
For crystallization and structural determination, a construct encoding human CysRCTLD3 (residues M1-S627) with a Cterminal 6xHis-tag was sub-cloned into the pFastBac vectors (Invitrogen).For Western blot assays and ELISA, a human Fc homodimeric fragment with 6xHis-tag at its C-termini was fused to the C-termini of CysRCTLD3.In parallel, CysRCTLD3 fused with GFP at the C-terminus was also sub-cloned into a pFastBac vector.The Sf9 cells were used for generating recombinant baculoviruses and High-Five (Hi5) cells were used for protein production.The infected cells were cultured in ESF921 medium (Expression Systems) for 3 days in a 27 C humidified incubator.The supernatants of the culture media were harvested and buffer-exchanged with 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl at pH 8.0 by dialysis, then applied to Ni-NTA chromatography (Ni-NTA Superflow, Qiangen).The eluted proteins were further purified by gel filtration chromatography with a HiLoad Superdex 200 16/ 600 pg column (GE Healthcare).All DEC205 samples were prepared following similar procedures.

Crystallization and structural determination
The purified proteins (CysRCTLD3) were bufferexchanged into 5 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl (pH 7.4) at 10 mg/ml concentration (measured by UV absorption at 280 nm).Crystal screening was performed at 18 C by hanging-drop vapor diffusion method using 48-well plates (Hampton Research, Molecular Dimensions, Wizard).The crystals were obtained in 0.2 M Sodium Citrate, 20% PEG3350, with pH ranging from 6.5 to pH 7.4.Diffraction data were collected using a PILATUS6M detector at BL18U beamline of the National Facility for Protein Science Shanghai (NFPS) at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and processed using the HKL3000 package (63).The diffraction data statistics are summarized in Table 1.Two crystal forms are found, one in space group C2 and the other in space group P1.The structures were solved by molecular replacement using the structures of human mannose receptor (PDB: 5XTS and 6INN) as search models by PHASER (64) and refined to 2.79 Å and 3.35 Å resolution, respectively, using Coot and Phenix (65,66).The refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1.

Western blot assays
Keratin fragments from human K1 or K10 expressed in E. coli were loaded onto SDS/PAGE (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and transferred onto PVDF membranes.The membranes were blocked with a blocking buffer (PBS, 5% (wt/vol) milk, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 6.0 or pH 7.4) and incubated in a blocking buffer containing the CysRCTLD3-Fc of DEC205 (10 μg/ml) for 2 h at room temperature.After washing three times (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 6.0 or pH 7.4), the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG Fcγ fragment-specific antibody (The Jackson Laboratory) and detected with the DAB reagent.

ELISA experiments
Keratin fragments from human K1 or K10 were buffer exchanged with 100 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.0) by dialysis, and then coated onto 96-well plates with 2 μg protein per well at 4 C overnight.The plates were then blocked with blocking buffers (PBS with 2% (wt/vol) BSA) with different pH values at 37 C for 3 h.CysRCTLD3-Fc were serially diluted and added to each well in a binding buffer (PBS, 2 mg/ml BSA) with preset pH values.After 2 h of incubation at 37 C, the plates were washed five times with pH-adjusted PBS (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20).The bound recombinant proteins were detected by HRP-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG Fcγ fragment-specific antibody (The Jackson Laboratory).After washing, 100 μl of chromogenic substrate (1 μg/ml tetramethylbenzidine, 0.006% H 2 O 2 in 0.05 M phosphate citrate buffer, pH 5.0) was added to each well and incubated for 30 min at 37 C.Then, 50 μl H 2 SO 4 (2.0 M) was added to each well to stop the reactions.The plates were read at 450 nm on a Synergy Neo machine (BioTek Instruments).The ELISA data shown in the figures are representative of three repeated experiments and presented as mean ± SD.The K D values were calculated based on the fitting of the sigmoidal curves using the software GraphPad Prism 9 (70,71).

Flow cytometry
Jurkat T cells were cultured in 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS (HyClone Laboratories).To induce apoptosis and necrosis, Jurkat cells were incubated in tissue culture flasks for several hours with 1 μg/ ml actinomycin D (ActD) until use.The ActD-induced cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4), and then washed with either PBS at pH 7.4 or PBS at pH 6.0 for different assays.The cells were incubated with the CysRCTLD3-GFP fragments in PBS (pH 7.4 or 6.0) for 20 min at room temperature and then washed by PBS (pH 7.4 or pH 6) again, and analyzed by flow cytometry.For keratin inhibition assays, the cells were washed with PBS (pH 6.0) and incubated with the CysRCTLD3-GFP fragments with or without the keratin fragments.The concentrations of K1 or K10 fragments were about 20 μg/ml.After washing twice with PBS (pH 6.0) again, the cells were analyzed by a Becton Dickinson FACS Caliber flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and CELLQuest software.Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Crystal structures of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205.A, a ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205 in space group C2.B, a ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205 in space group P1.C, a homodimer of the CysRCTLD3 fragment in one asymmetric unit of P1 crystal form.CysR, FnII, CTLD1, CTLD2 and CTLD3 are colored in red, yellow, green, forest and cyan, respectively.The position of H129 is also shown.D, crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of DEC205 (left), MR (middle, PDB: 6INN) and Endo180 (right, PDB: 5AO5).E, superposition of the crystal structure of the CysRCTLD3 fragment of DEC205 with the cryoEM structures determined at acidic (left) or basic (right) conditions.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Structural comparison of the N-terminal individual domains of DEC205 with MR and Endo180.A, crystal structures of the CysR domains of DEC205 (left, red) and MR (right, yellow, PDB: 6INN).The residues around the binding pocket (red arrow) for 4-SO 4 -GalNAc of MR are labeled.B, crystal structures of the FnII domains of DEC205 (left, yellow), MR (middle, green, PDB: 6INN) and Endo180 (right, cyan, PDB: 5AO5).The residues around the collagen binding grooves (red arrows) of MR and Endo180 are labeled.C, the crystal structures of CTLD3 of DEC205 (left, green) and MR (right, blue, PDB: 6INN).Loop 1 (E521-C528) of CTLD3 of DEC205 and its counterpart of MR (T524-E535) are colored in orange (dashed red ovals).The electron density (blue) of loop 1 is shown in a red rectangle.Loop 2 (T573-A592) of CTLD3 of DEC205 and its counterpart of MR (E581-M593) are colored in yellow.The missing residues (V574-R578) in loop 2 of CTLD3 of DEC205 is shown as a dashed yellow line.D, the interface between CTLD1 (green) and CTLD2 (forest) of DEC205 in the crystal structure.The residues of CTLD1 (purple) and CTLD2 (gray) at the interface are shown.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Interactions of the N-terminal fragments of DEC205 with the K10 fragments.A, schematic representation of the domain arrangement of K10 and the truncation fragments expressed for binding assays.B, Western blot assays of the CysR-CTLD3 fragment with the K10 fragments (T1-T5) at acidic or basic pH.The SDS-PAGE of the fragments are shown on the left.The Western blot results at acidic and basic pH are shown in the middle and on the right, respectively.Fragments T2-T5 are fused with a SUMO tag.C, Western blot assays of the CysR-CTLD3 fragment with the K10 fragments (T1, T6-T11) at acidic or basic pH.The SDS-PAGE of the fragments are shown on the left.The Western blot results at acidic and basic pH are shown in the middle and on the right, respectively.Fragments T6-T11 are fused with a SUMO tag.D, ELISA experiments of the CysRCTLD3 fragment with K10-T1 and K10-T10.The SUMO protein is applied as a control.E, inhibition of the interaction of the CysR-CTLD3 fragment with dead cells by K10-T1, K10-T10, and K10-T11 by flow cytometry.ELISA data are representative of three repeated experiments and presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 4 .Figure 5 .
Figure 4. Interactions of the N-terminal fragments of DEC205 with the K1 fragments and the motifs identified from keratins.A, schematic representation of the domain arrangement of K1 and the truncation fragments expressed for binding assays (left) and the sequences from K1 and K10 that can interact with DEC205 (right).B, ELISA of the CysRCTLD3 fragment with K1-T1, K1-T2 and K1-T3.C, inhibition of the interaction of the CysR-CTLD3 fragment with dead cells by K1-T2 and K1-T3 by flow cytometry.D, the XGGGX motif identified in human keratins.The sequences of the tail or head regions of human type I and type II epithelial keratins (K1-K28, K71-K80) are downloaded from UniProt, and the XGGGX sequence are searched and picked manually.ELISA data are representative of three repeated experiments and presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Interaction of DEC205 with keratins.A, the potential pH-dependent interaction between the CysR domain and CTLD3 of DEC205.The surface electrostatic potential of the CysR domain (top) and CTLD3 (bottom) at acidic and basic pH are shown.The positive and negative charges are colored in blue and red, respectively.The regions of the two domains that may contact are labeled with green circles.The position of H129 is also shown.B, the crystal structure of CTLD3 of DEC205 (left) and the AlphaFold prediction of the interaction of CTLD3 with a keratin peptide (K10-T10, GSSGGGHGGG, dark blue) (black dashed oval; right).Loop 1 (E521-C528) and loop 2 (T573-A592) of CTLD3 are colored in orange and yellow, respectively.The missing residues (V574-R578) in loop 2 of the crystal structure of CTLD3 is shown as a dashed yellow line.

Table 1
Crystallographic statistics of the structures of CysRCTLD3 of DEC205 Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shells.