Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lowey, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lowey, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Optical Rotatory Dispersion Studies of Rabbit ggrG-Immunoglobulin and Its Papain Fragments

Lisa A. Steiner 1 and Susan Lowey 1

From the 1 From the Department of Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, and the Children's Cancer Research Foundation and the Department of Biological Chemistry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Certain purified antibodies can be distinguished from nonspecific ggrG-immunoglobulin by optical rotatory dispersion in the ultraviolet region. Thus, inert ggrG-globulin has troughs at 231 mµ ([R'] = -1320) and 224 mµ ([R') = -1240) while anti-2,4-dinitrophenyl (anti-DNP) antibody of high affinity for ligand has its major trough at 224 mµ ([R'] = -1650). The rotatory dispersion of high affinity anti-2,4,6-trinitrophenyl antibody resembles that of low affinity anti-DNP antibody ([R']224 = -1300). The characteristic optical rotation of anti-DNP antibody does not appear to be related to variation in allotypy or charge. Furthermore, it is not a consequence of the antibody purification procedure.

The difference in optical rotation between anti-DNP antibody and inert ggrG-globulin is confined to Fab, the active fragment produced by papain digestion. The active fragments of both proteins have troughs at 224 mµ, but that of the antibody is deeper. In contrast, the crystallizable fragments, Fc, are virtually identical, with no trough at 224 but with well defined minima at 233 mµ.

Despite differences in Cotton effects, inert ggrG-globulin and anti-DNP antibody, as well as the corresponding pieces obtained by digestion with papain, are very similar in their over-all conformation as shown by sedimentation and molecular weight studies. Therefore, the variation in optical rotation is probably related to very limited structural differences within the ggrG-immunoglobulins.

Submitted on July 29, 1965


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
H. N. Eisen, J. R. Little, C. K. Osterland, and E. S. Simms
A Myeloma Protein with Antibody Activity
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1967; 32(0): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement