Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Change in Specificity of Chymotrypsin Caused by Chemical Modification of Methionine Residues

H. Weiner 1, C. W. Batt 1, and D. E. Koshland Jr. 1

From the 1 From the Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York

The specificity patterns of chymotrypsins in which the methionine residues have been converted to the sulfoxide have been examined relative to the native enzyme. When the surface methionine residue 3 residues away from the active serine is oxidized, the specificity pattern is quite similar to the native enzyme as judged by the relative rates of hydrolysis of ester and peptide substrates. When both methionine residues are oxidized to the sulfoxide, however, notable changes of the ratios occur. For example, the acetyltyrosinamide activity becomes undetectable, decreased by a factor of over 400, whereas the acetyltyrosine ethyl ester activity decreases by a factor of 4. The change in specificity is not related in a simple way either to a chemical property such as carbon-nitrogen versus the carbon-oxygen bond nor to the size of the substrate. Moreover, the binding properties for many substrates and all-or-none assay are changed very little. A plausible explanation for the observations is that the oxidation of the interior methionine residue does not change the basic catalytic power of the enzyme but does cause subtle changes in the relationship between substrate and enzyme which affects its specificity.

Submitted on November 18, 1965


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Van Patten, E. Hanson, R. Bernasconi, K. Zhang, P. Manavalan, E. S. Cole, J. M. McPherson, and T. Edmunds
Oxidation of Methionine Residues in Antithrombin. EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY AND HEPARIN BINDING
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 1999; 274(15): 10268 - 10276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Neurath, K. A. Walsh, and W. P. Winter
Evolution of Structure and Function of Proteases: Amino acid sequences of proteolytic enzymes reflect phylogenetic relationships
Science, December 29, 1967; 158(3809): 1638 - 1644.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement