Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillcoat, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blakley, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillcoat, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blakley, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Dihydrofolate Reductase of Streptococcus faecalis

I. PURIFICATION AND SOME PROPERTIES OF REDUCTASE FROM THE WILD STRAIN AND FROM STRAIN A

B. L. Hillcoat 1 and R. L. Blakley 1

From the 1 From the Department of Biochemistry, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Unfractionated extracts of an amethopterin-resistant mutant of Streptococcus faecalis contained from 10 to 100 times more dihydrofolate reductase activity than the wild strain (ATCC 8043). Extracts of the mutant strain also contained significant folate reductase, but this was not detectable in wild strain extracts. Dihydrofolate reductase has been purified 100 to 500 times from the mutant extracts and 200 to 700 times from extracts of the wild strain by a procedure involving repeated gel filtration and ammonium sulfate precipitation. The procedure also results in about 70-fold purification of folate reductase from the mutant. The purified preparation from the mutant has dihydrofolate reductase specific activity greater than that calculated for the pure enzyme obtained from mammalian sources but has about the same molecular weight (approximately 21,000) as the latter; the turnover number of the bacterial enzyme is therefore higher than that of the mammalian enzyme. Evidence is presented that more than one species of dihydrofolate reductase is present in the purified preparation from the mutant, and the significance of this multiplicity of enzyme species is discussed.

Submitted on November 19, 1965


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Shallom, K. Zhang, L. Jiang, and P. K. Rathod
Essential Protein-Protein Interactions between Plasmodium falciparum Thymidylate Synthase and Dihydrofolate Reductase Domains
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 1999; 274(53): 37781 - 37786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement