JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weimer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weimer, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Isolation of Crystalline i-Urobilinogen (Mesobilirubinogen) from Feces

COMPARISON WITH CRYSTALLINE d-UROBILINOGEN (H44) AND SEPARATION OF NATURAL i-UROBILIN INTO OPTICALLY ACTIVE COMPONENTS

C. J. Watson 1, Albert Moscowitz 1, D. Lightner 1, W. C. Krueger 1, and Mary Weimer 1

From the 1 From the Departments of Medicine and Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Crystalline i-urobilinogen has been isolated from the feces of two individuals at appropriate intervals after discontinuance of tetracycline. The crystals from the first case were completely separated from dihydromesobilirubin and were highly similar to synthetic mesobilirubinogen in respect to a number of physical properties. Both are optically inactive from 600 to 200 mµ. A dextrorotatory component of the i-urobilin, formed by simple dehydrogenation of the recrystallized i-urobilinogen, separated by crystallization, leaving an l component in the mother liquor.

The i-urobilinogen crystallized from the feces of the second case, although having the same crystal habit as synthetic mesobilirubinogen, could not be separated entirely from dihydromesobilirubin. Nevertheless the crystalline i-urobilin prepared after oxidative elimination of dihydromesobilirubin separated into optically active components, although this separation was less complete, even on recrystallization, than with the urobilin from the first case. Possible reasons for this difference and for the greater difficulty in resolving synthetic i-urobilin are discussed.

Crystalline d-urobilinogen (H44) was prepared by catalytic hydrogenation of d-urobilinogen from feces. This is readily distinguished, on the basis of several physical properties, from i-urobilin or synthetic mesobilirubinogen. The d-urobilin (H42) prepared from it was identical in respect to a number of physical properties with d-urobilin obtained from i-urobilin.

Submitted on March 18, 1966


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.