JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decker, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decker, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Amphoteric Behavior of Bovine Plasma Albumin and Its Detergent Complexes

Rolan V. Decker 1 and Joseph F. Foster 1

From the 1 From the Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Hydrogen ion titration curves have been determined for two stoichiometric albumin-detergent complexes, AD11 and AD76, which are formed through interaction between bovine plasma albumin and the detergent sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate. The amphoteric properties of the protein moiety in these two complexes have been compared with one another and with those of the uncombined protein. In this analysis, electrophoretic mobility data were used for making the necessary corrections for electrostatic interaction. Tyrosyl ionization curves were established for all three forms by measuring the change with pH of absorption at 295 mµ. The most significant differences found are in the tyrosyl ionization. For albumin itself, the apparent value of pKint is approximately 11.0, and it is concluded that some masked tyrosyl residues are exposed in a cooperative structural change accompanying the ionization. In the case of AD11, tyrosyl ionization is distinctly hypersharp and the apparent pKint is 11.3, implying that in this form the protein is stabilized against unmasking of the tyrosyl residues. In AD76 the apparent pKint is again near 11.0. The titration behavior of imidazole groups is virtually identical in the native protein and in the AD11 complex. In both cases it is necessary to assume two classes of imidazole groups in order to fit the titration curve. In AD76 the titration of these groups can be fitted adequately with a single pKint of 7.30. Surprisingly, very little difference is seen between the various forms in the titration of the egr-amino groups. This fact permits the conclusion that electrostatic interaction between the detergent anions and cationic ammonium groups cannot contribute more than 700 cal to the free energy of binding, whereas the total binding free energy (on the unitary scale) must be of the order of 10,000 cal. The fact that the stoichiometry of the complexes is virtually unaltered over the pH range 6.9 to 11.6, over which range the total number of cationic sites in the protein falls from approximately 100 to 40, supports the conclusion that binding is not primarily electrostatic but is probably due to hydrophobic interactions. To a first approximation, all results suggest that the protein in AD11 is essentially in the native state and in fact is stabilized with respect to the structural alteration which must occur on conversion to AD76.

Submitted on September 20, 1966


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.