JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

JBC, Vol. 252, Issue 1, 291-292, Jan, 1977

Measurement of superhelix densities in buoyant dye/CsCl. The use of a standard other than native SV40 DNA

R. L. Burke and W. Bauer

The dye-induced separation between closed and open duplex DNAs in buoyant CsCl is determined primarily by the superhelix density of the closed DNA, provided that all other experimental variables (such as the solution density and dye concentration) are held constant. The extent of the buoyant separation may be used to estimate the superhelix density of an uncharacterized closed DNA, by comparison with the corresponding separation with native SV40 DNAs under identical conditions. We present here an extension of these quantitative relationships to permit the use of an arbitrarily selected closed duplex DNA of known superhelix density, with the accompanying open form, as a reference. The general result is that the ratio of buoyant separations for any two closed/open DNA pairs remains a linear function of the difference in superhelix densities between the closed DNAs. The value of the proportionality constant depends, however, upon the magnitude of the superhelix density of the closed DNA selected as reference.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.