JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Freisheim, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Freisheim, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 255, Issue 14, 6542-6545, Jul, 1980

Activation of bovine and chicken liver dihydrofolate reductases and its relationship to a specific cysteine residue in their NH2-terminal amino acid sequences

BT Kaufman, AA Kumar, DT Blankenship and JH Freisheim

The enzymatic activity of bovine liver dihydrofolate reductase is activated approximately 1.5- to 2.5-fold on treatment with organic mercurials. In contrast to the almost instantaneous reaction and high degree of activation (approximately 10-fold) observed with chicken liver dihydrofolate reductase, the beef liver enzyme requires relatively specific conditions of pH, temperature, preincubation times, and presence of substrate to exhibit this degree of activation. It is also demonstrated that both chicken liver and beef liver dihydrofolate reductases (and perhaps all of the animal dihydrofolate reductases) contain a single sulfhydryl group within the 11 or so amino acids of the NH2-terminal sequence and that this is the site of mercurial interaction and activation. On the other hand, this sulfhydryl group and the characteristic activation does not occur in the corresponding bacterial reductases. It is suggested that although the reactive sulfhydryl group may be characteristic of animal dihydrofolate reductases, it is not directly required for substrate binding or the catalytic mechanism per se.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Y. Wang, J. A. Bruenn, S. F. Queener, and V. Cody
Isolation of Rat Dihydrofolate Reductase Gene and Characterization of Recombinant Enzyme
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2001; 45(9): 2517 - 2523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.