JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, W. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 255, Issue 2, 353-356, Jan, 1980

Oxidation-reduction properties and complexation reactions of the iron- molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase

BK Burgess, EI Stiefel and WE Newton

The interactions of the iron-molybdenum cofactor, FeMoco, isolated from acid-treated Azotobacter vinelandii molybdenum-iron protein (Av1) with EDTA and thiophenol in N-methylformamide solution have been reinvestigated. Our studies show that EDTA alone is sufficient to eliminate the EPR signal of dithionite-reduced FeMoco. Neither light/5- deazaflavin nor carbon monoxide are required, which implies that this EPR-silent form of FeMoco does not correspond to the EPR-silent, substrate-reducing state of Av1. As EDTA-treated FeMoco does not regain EPR activity on addition of sodium dithionite or thiophenol, it is apparently distinct from the EPR-silent form of either dye-oxidized FeMoco or dye-oxidized Av1. Thiophenol sharpens the EPR signal of dithionite-reduced FeMoco and shifts the g = 3.3 feature to g = 3.6. This shift is complete at 1:1 ratio of thiophenol/Mo atom, while the EDTA effect requires about 40 molecules/Mo atom. Thiophenol and EDTA probably affect different sites of FeMoco. The binding of either reactant does not affect the activity of FeMoco as measured by its ability to reconstitute extracts of A. vinelandii mutant UW45.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. W. Peters, K. Fisher, W. E. Newton, and D. R. Dean
Involvement of the P Cluster in Intramolecular Electron Transfer within the Nitrogenase MoFe Protein
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 1995; 270(45): 27007 - 27013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.