|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 255, Issue 21, 10115-10119, Nov, 1980
M Dunaway, JS Olson, JM Rosenberg, OB Kallai, RE Dickerson and KS Matthews
The rates of binding of inducer molecules to the lactose repressor protein
are significantly affected by the presence of bound operator DNA fragments.
The association rate is decreased from 4.6 x 10(4) M-1S- 1 to 1.0 x 10(4)
M-1S-1 by the presence of saturating amounts of operator DNA fragments. The
inducer dissociation rate was measured by dilution of repressor . operator
. inducer complexes and by displacement of the sugar molecule from
repressor by the binding of operator DNA. The value for the dissociation
rate in the presence of bound DNA was 0.8 S-1; this is 4-fold greater than
the inducer dissociation rate measured in the absence of operator. These
kinetic results suggest that repressor should exhibit a 20-fold lower
affinity for inducer when operator DNA fragments are bound; this prediction
is in agreement with previous equilibrium measurements. Measurement of the
rate of operator fragment dissociation from repressor using a
nitrocellulose filter assay yields a value of 0.04 S-1 in the absence of
inducer; this dissociation rate is too rapid to measure in the presence of
bound inducer molecules. Calculations assuming that the DNA- protein
association rate is unaffected by sugar binding suggest that the rate of
dissociation of DNA from repressor containing 4 bound inducer molecules may
be as high as 40 S-1. Determination of the apparent association rate for
inducer binding to operator DNA fragments indicates that DNA molecules do
dissociate from the protein . operator . inducer complex at intermediate
stages during the sugar binding reaction. The exact point at which
dissociation occurs at a complex function of the concentrations of operator
and inducer and the relationship between the rates for sugar binding and
for operator fragment dissociation which are comparable for some of the
protein species.
Kinetic studies of inducer binding to lac repressor.operator complex
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Krishna, S. Semsey, and K. Sneppen Combinatorics of feedback in cellular uptake and metabolism of small molecules PNAS, December 26, 2007; 104(52): 20815 - 20819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Elf, G.-W. Li, and X. S. Xie Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell Science, May 25, 2007; 316(5828): 1191 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Swint-Kruse, C. Larson, B. M. Pettitt, and K. S. Matthews Fine-tuning function: Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR Protein Sci., April 1, 2002; 11(4): 778 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |