JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuehl, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuehl, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 255, Issue 22, 10671-10675, 11, 1980

Binding of the high mobility group protein, H6, to trout testis chromatin

L Kuehl, DJ Barton and GH Dixon

When 125I-labeled H6 was incubated with trout testis nuclei under conditions of pH and ionic strength approximating those in vivo, the radioactivity bound nearly quantitatively to the chromatin. Under comparable conditions, most non-nuclear proteins do not bind. Binding was neither tissue- nor species-specific, and HMG-17, a mammalian homolog of H6, behaved similarly to H6. The labeled and the endogenous H6 molecules were equivalent by several criteria: 1) Both were released nearly quantitatively upon treatment of the chromatin with DNase I, whereas neither was released by digestion with micrococcal nuclease, suggesting that the labeled molecules, like those of endogenous H6, were bound primarily to the core particles in transcriptionally competent portions of the genome. 2) Salt extraction curves were similar for both the labeled and unlabeled proteins, although about 15% of the labeled molecules were bound to the chromatin more loosely than those of the endogenous H6. Taken together, these results suggest that chromatin contains specific, well defined sites to which H6 binds. Upon increasing the concentration of H6 in the incubation mixture, progressively greater numbers of low affinity, presumably nonspecific binding sites become occupied. This observation has important implications for studies in which nucleases are employed to probe chromatin structure, since they suggest that H6 molecules released from specific, high affinity sites by the action of the nuclease might rebind more loosely to other regions of the chromatin.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.