![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 255, Issue 23, 11163-11172, Dec, 1980
TL Innerarity, RE Pitas and RW Mahley
This study characterizes the interactions of various rat and human
lipoproteins with the lipoprotein cell surface receptors of rat and human
cells. Iodinated rat very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), rat chylomicron
remnants, rat low density lipoproteins (LDL), and rat high density
lipoproteins containing predominantly apoprotein E (HDL1) bound to high
affinity cell surface receptors of cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth
muscle cells. Rat VLDL and chylomicron remnants were most avidly bound; the
B-containing LDL and the E-containing HDL1 displayed lesser but similar
binding. Rat HDL (d = 1.125 to 1.21) exhibited weak receptor binding;
however, after recentrifugation to remove apoprotein E, they were devoid of
binding activity. Competitive binding studies at 4 degrees C confirmed
these results for normal lipoproteins and indicated that VLDL (B-VLDL),
LDL, and HDLc (cholesterol-rich HDL1) isolated from hypercholesterolemic
rats had increased affinity for the rat receptors compared with their
normal counterparts, the most pronounced change being in the LDL. The cell
surface receptor pathway in rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells
resembled the system described for human fibroblasts as follows: 1)
lipoproteins containing either the B or E apoproteins interacted with the
receptors; 2) receptor binding activity was abolished by acetoacetylation
or reductive methylation of a limited number of lysine residues of the
lipoproteins; 3) receptor binding initiated the process of internalization
and degradation of the apo-B- and apo-E-containing lipoproteins; 4) the
lipoprotein cholesterol was re-esterified as determined by [14C]oleate
incorporation into the cellular cholesteryl esters; and 5)
receptor-mediated uptake (receptor number) was lipoprotein cholesterol. An
important difference between rat and human fibroblasts was the inability of
human LDL to interact with the cell surface receptors of rat fibroblasts.
Rat lipoproteins did, however, react with human fibroblasts. Furthermore,
the rat VLDL were the most avidly bound of the rat lipoproteins to rat
fibroblasts. When the direct binding of 125I-VLDL was subjected to
Scatchard analysis, the very high affinity of rat VLDL was apparent (Kd = 1
X 10(-11) M). Moreover, compared with data for rat LDL, the data suggested
each VLDL particle bound to four to nine lipoprotein receptors. This
multiple receptor binding could explain the enhanced binding affinity of
the rat VLDL. The Scatchard plot of rat 125I-VLDL revealed a biphasic
binding curve in rat and human fibroblast cells and in rat smooth muscle
cells, suggesting two populations of rat VLDL. These results indicate that
rat cells have a receptor pathway similar to, but not identical with, the
LDL pathway of human cells. Since human LDL bind poorly to rat cell
receptors on cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, metabolic
studies using human lipoproteins in rats must be interpreted cautiously.
Disparities in the interaction of rat and human lipoproteins with cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Requirements for homology for receptor binding activity
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Corsini, D. Verri, M. Raiteri, P. Quarato, R. Paoletti, and R. Fumagalli Effects of 26-Aminocholesterol, 27-Hydroxycholesterol, and 25-Hydroxycholesterol on Proliferation and Cholesterol Homeostasis in Arterial Myocytes Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 1995; 15(3): 420 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |