JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Agranoff, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Agranoff, B. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 258, Issue 12, 7358-7363, 06, 1983

Muscarinic agonist binding and phospholipid turnover in brain

SK Fisher, PD Klinger and BW Agranoff

The ability of muscarinic cholinergic agonists to interact with muscarinic receptors in nerve ending preparations and elicit an increased labeling of phosphatidate and phosphatidylinositol from 32Pi has been investigated. Two groups of brain muscarinic agonists are distinguished. Addition of acetylcholine, carbamylcholine, methacholine, or muscarine resulted in a 2-fold stimulation of phosphatidate and phosphatidylinositol labeling, while bethanechol, pilocarpine, arecoline, and oxotremorine were less effective. Simultaneous addition of two agonists from the more effective group did not result in any further increase in stimulated labeling, while the addition of agonists from the less effective group antagonized the stimulatory effect of carbamylcholine. All of the agonists could completely displace binding of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, a muscarinic antagonist. The displacement of the labeled antagonist by the more effective agonists was more complex than that predicted from a simple mass action isotherm and was compatible with the interaction of the agonists with high and low affinity forms of the receptor. Conversely, the displacement data from less effective agonists did not deviate markedly from those predicted for interaction of the agonists with a single affinity form of the receptor. Dose-response curves for stimulated phosphatidate labeling obtained in the presence of acetylcholine, carbamylcholine, and methacholine were predominantly correlated with occupation of the low affinity form of the muscarinic receptor. These results suggest that the enhancement of phosphatidate and phosphatidylinositol turnover in brain is caused by agonist- mediated conformational changes in the muscarinic receptor and that the ability of an agonist to induce this conversion may be predicted by its differential binding to the high and low affinity forms of the receptor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Congar, X. Leinekugel, Y. Ben-Ari, and V. Crepel
A Long-Lasting Calcium-Activated Nonselective Cationic Current Is Generated by Synaptic Stimulation or Exogenous Activation of Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
J. Neurosci., July 15, 1997; 17(14): 5366 - 5379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. K. Vogel, V. A. Mosser, D. A. Bulseco, and M. I. Schimerlik
Porcine m2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor-Effector Coupling in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
J. Biol. Chem., June 30, 1995; 270(26): 15485 - 15493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.