JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nussinov, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nussinov, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 259, Issue 11, 6798-6805, Jun, 1984

Promoter helical structure variation at the Escherichia coli polymerase interaction sites

R Nussinov

There is evidence that the Escherichia coli polymerase recognizes and binds to three sites on the promoter DNA: the -10, -35, and -16 regions. Sequence homology was noted among the -10 sites (Pribnow box) and among the -35s with consensus sequences, TATAAT and TTGACA , respectively. Weak nucleotide sequence homology was detected at -16. Since the polymerase recognizes these sites in a multitude of promoters, one expects similarities in the three-dimensional structures. To date, no data directly bearing on such structures exist. Recently, Calladine ( Calladine , C.R. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 161, 343- 352) and, subsequently, Dickerson ( Dickerson , R.E. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 166, 419-441) suggested "rules" for doublestranded DNA structures which were tested against data from several known crystals. Using these rules, I compare the deviations from "ideal" B-DNA of the twist angles, base pair roll, sideways shift, and propeller suppression in 56 promoters at the three sites. I also appended to these the twist angle computations on additional 77 promoters from the recently published compilation of promoter sequences. For the latter, additional nucleotides from the spacer regions were added. The results display similarities at the -10 site. Equally strong similarities were obtained for the -35 and the -16 contact regions. The existence of structural differences for some sites is likely to account for the different degrees of efficiency of the polymerase recognition and transcriptional regulation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Gunewardena and Z. Zhang
A hybrid model for robust detection of transcription factor binding sites
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2008; 24(4): 484 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Burr, J. Mitchell, A. Kolb, S. Minchin, and S. Busby
DNA sequence elements located immediately upstream of the -10 hexamer in Escherichia coli promoters: a systematic study
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2000; 28(9): 1864 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.