JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lieberman, M. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 259, Issue 20, 12463-12469, Oct, 1984

The distribution of DNA excision-repair sites in human diploid fibroblasts following ultraviolet irradiation

SM Cohn and MW Lieberman

Using the technique for separating DNA fragments containing excision- repair sites from total genomic DNA as described in the previous paper (Cohn, S. M., and Lieberman, M. W. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 12456- 12462), we have developed a method for directly determining the distribution of excision-repair sites in the genome. DNA was prepared from confluent, diploid human fibroblasts which had been irradiated with ultraviolet light and incubated in the presence of 5-bromo-2'- deoxyuridine (BrdUrd), repaired fragments were isolated, and the dependence of the fraction of total DNA fragments containing excision- repair sites on DNA fragment length was determined by electrophoretic analysis. The observed dependence was compared to the relationship expected for a random distribution of repair sites. At 36 h following 3 J/m2 UV, the distribution of repair sites was indistinguishable from a random distribution; however, at doses of UV above 6 J/m2, the observed dependence indicated that the distribution of repair sites was nonrandom. A time course of the distribution of repair sites following 12 J/m2 UV was clearly nonrandom from 4 h after irradiation until at least 36 h following irradiation. By 72 h, however, the distribution had become random. In cells treated with hydroxyurea, a reduced number of excision-repair sites were present, but the distribution of repair sites was also nonrandom. Autoradiographic analysis of the amount of unscheduled DNA synthesis in individual nuclei suggested that the nonrandom distribution of repair sites did not result from variable extents of repair synthesis in different cell populations or from cell death.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
B. C. McKay, M. Ljungman, and A. J. Rainbow1
Potential roles for p53 in nucleotide excision repair
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 1999; 20(8): 1389 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.