JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, K.
Right arrow Articles by Garel, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, K.
Right arrow Articles by Garel, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 259, Issue 4, 2252-2256, Feb, 1984

The interaction between Escherichia coli aspartokinase-homoserine dehydrogenase and 3-acetylpyridine-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced), an analog of NADPH

K Muller and JR Garel

The interaction of 3-acetylpyridine-adenine dinucleotide phosphate, a structural analog of NADPH, with aspartokinase-homoserine dehydrogenase has been studied by fluorescence and activity measurements. This analog binds to the same site and with the same affinity as does the natural coenzyme. Also, the binding of homoserine to the dehydrogenase site or that of threonine to the regulatory site is the same whether NADPH or its analog is bound to the enzyme. So NADPH and its analog appear as equivalent in the formation of various stable enzyme-ligand(s) complexes. The analog resembles NADPH enough so that it is a substrate that the enzyme can use to reduce aspartate semialdehyde; the maximum velocity of this dehydrogenase reaction is however reduced by 90% as compared to that with NADPH. It seems as if one of the catalytic steps is affected by the replacement of a--CONH2 group by--COCH3. Another difference between the two coenzymes is that the reaction with the analog is insensitive to threonine, whereas that with NADPH is inhibited. The lack of inhibition is not due to a lack of binding, but rather to a difference in the ternary complexes composed of enzyme, coenzyme, and substrate. A possible relationship between the inhibition by threonine and the mechanism of the dehydrogenase reaction is thus suggested by this comparison between NADPH and its analog.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.