JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skipper, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skipper, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 260, Issue 27, 14636-14641, 11, 1985

Electrophoretic analysis of the estrogen receptor. Relationship of multiple receptor forms to the molybdate-stabilized form

JK Skipper, FI Davidson and TH Hamilton

The origin of and relationships among multiple forms of the estrogen receptor from rat uteri were investigated using electrophoretic and conventional hydrodynamic methods of analysis. Evidence is presented that the molybdate-stabilized, multimeric receptor (Stokes radius approximately 70A; S20,w approximately 9.5 S; Mr approximately 290,000) corresponds to an acidic form of the receptor that has relatively high electrophoretic mobility. This discrete form, which appears to represent the untransformed state that does not bind to DNA, was converted to a number of derived forms by exposure to conditions that result in receptor transformation and/or subunit dissociation. In crude cytosol, transformation always generated receptor forms that were excluded from polyacrylamide gels, and it was shown that these are large heterogeneous aggregates. This explains previous failed attempts to analyze the receptor by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Transformation of partially purified, molybdate-stabilized receptor never led to aggregate formation, but resulted instead in the generation of two relatively basic estrogen-binding species of low electrophoretic mobility. These components may represent the free or dissociated estrogen-binding subunits. Together, the results suggest a model for the molybdate-stabilized receptor wherein at least one of its components is an acidic, nonestrogen-binding subunit.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.