![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 260, Issue 29, 15420-15426, 12, 1985
KS Korach, C Fox-Davies, VE Quarmby and MH Swaisgood
Diethylstilbestrol (DES) and certain chemically structural derivatives and
analogs, indenestrol A (IA), indenestrol B (IB), indanestrol (IN), and
pseudo-DES (PD), have been used as probes to examine various estrogenic
responses previously considered interrelated and obligatory to the
stimulation of uterine growth. All the analogs had poor uterotropic
activity in vivo which ranged from 10-200 times less than that of estradiol
or DES. The poor uterotropic activity was not due to poor binding affinity
for the receptor. All compounds except IN interacted with the mouse uterine
estrogen receptor with high affinity (approximately Ka 1.5-2.2 X 10(10)
M-1). In addition, the compounds were able to translocate similar levels of
receptor to the nucleus in vivo. Nuclear retention and occupancy of the
estrogen receptor by the compounds was comparable to the patterns produced
by DES or estradiol. The activity of uterine tissue responses was
investigated during treatment with the compounds. Only IA stimulated
uterine glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenase to significant levels similar to
DES or estradiol. Uterine progesterone receptor was induced to varying
degrees by all compounds; the indenestrol isomers (IA and IB) were the most
active. Uterine DNA synthesis was marginally stimulated by the derivatives
and analogs except for IB which showed a response increase comparable to
DES or estradiol. Because of the differential stimulation, these data
suggest that in uterine tissue estrogen receptor stimulates certain
biochemical responses independently and not in concert. The ability of a
particular response to be increased may depend on the chemical nature of
the ligand receptor complex and its interaction at genomic sites.
Diethylstilbestrol metabolites and analogs. Biochemical probes for differential stimulation of uterine estrogen responses
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Logie, M. Nichols, K. Myles, J. W. Funder, and A. F. Stewart Positive and Negative Discrimination of Estrogen Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using Site-Specific DNA Recombinase Fusion Proteins Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 1998; 12(8): 1120 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Das, J. A. Taylor, K. S. Korach, B. C. Paria, S. K. Dey, and D. B. Lubahn Estrogenic responses in estrogen receptor-alpha deficient mice reveal a distinct estrogen signaling pathway PNAS, November 25, 1997; 94(24): 12786 - 12791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Bocchinfuso and K. S. Korach Estrogen Receptor Residues Required for Stereospecific Ligand Recognition and Activation Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 1997; 11(5): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |