![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 260, Issue 5, 2675-2680, 03, 1985
TH Hudson and DM Neville Jr
The rate-limiting step in diphtheria toxin (DT) intoxication of Vero cells
has been determined utilizing cycloheximide as an inhibitor of the
intoxication process. Cycloheximide is shown to inhibit the toxin catalyzed
ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor 2 (EF-2). The inhibition is blocked
by puromycin thus establishing the ribosome as the location of
cycloheximide protection. Washing cells free of cycloheximide rapidly
reverses the protective effect. The initial rates of protein synthesis
inhibition observed after removal of cycloheximide from DT-intoxicated
cells are 5 to 12-fold greater than rates observed in unprotected cells and
are shown to reflect ADP-ribosylation of EF-2 by cytosolic DT. Ten to
thirty minutes after cycloheximide removal, the rate of protein synthesis
inhibition abruptly changes to values identical to those of unprotected
cells. Both the initial rates and extent of the initial rapid inactivation
are directly related to toxin concentration and time of incubation with DT
in the presence of cycloheximide. We concluded that: the rate-limiting step
in protein synthesis inhibition by DT is not the ADP-ribosylation of EF-2
by cytosolic toxin but rather the earlier entry step of DT into the
cytosol. DT enters the cytosol as a bolus of sufficient size to rapidly
inactivate all EF-2 in that cell. It is inferred from 1 and 2 that the
first order inactivation rate exhibited by DT is the result of the
probability of the release of a bolus of toxin to the cytosol of any cell
in the population per unit time. Autoradiographic analysis of intoxicated
cell populations support this two-population state model. The size of a
single bolus or quantum of DT is calculated from data over the range of
10(-11) to 10(-9) M DT and is found to remain constant. We suggest that the
cytosolic entry mechanism of DT results from a unique ability of the
internalized toxin molecules to destabilize the vesicular membrane
resulting in a random release of a bolus of toxin into the cytosol. Because
the bolus size remains constant over a 50-fold change in receptor occupancy
the possibility is raised that DT undergoes a post-receptor packaging
process, package size remaining a constant and package number increasing
with receptor occupancy.
Quantal entry of diphtheria toxin to the cytosol
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Antignani and R. J. Youle Endosome fusion induced by diphtheria toxin translocation domain PNAS, June 10, 2008; 105(23): 8020 - 8025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Falnes, S. Ariansen, K. Sandvig, and S. Olsnes Requirement for Prolonged Action in the Cytosol for Optimal Protein Synthesis Inhibition by Diphtheria Toxin J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2000; 275(6): 4363 - 4368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |