![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 262, Issue 10, 4460-4471, 04, 1987
A Goldbeter and DE Koshland Jr
Regulation by reversible, covalent modification of proteins requires a
continuous expenditure of energy, even in a steady-state situation. The
cost of this energy drain is evaluated for the case of an effector
controlling the modifying enzyme and an effector controlling the
demodifying enzyme and for the case of dual control in which an effector
activates one of these enzymes and inhibits the other. Energy consumption
is determined when the converter enzymes are functioning in the first-order
and zero-order domains. The profile of energy expenditure versus fractional
protein modification at steady state varies both as a function of the
mechanism of control of the converter enzymes and of the kinetic domain in
which they operate. This theory allows one to predict the strategies that
would minimize energy costs. Dual control appears to provide maximum
sensitivity with minimal energy expenditure. The analysis is applied to two
experimental systems. Comparison of ATP turnover rates with rates for
individual modification enzymes in living systems shows that a significant
fraction of the total energy expenditure of an organism is required for the
large number of reactions which involve covalent modification of proteins.
It is concluded that there will be selection pressure for energy-efficient
control of covalent regulation.
Energy expenditure in the control of biochemical systems by covalent modification
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Qian Amplifying Signal Transduction Specificity without Multiple Phosphorylation Biophys. J., February 1, 2003; 84(2): 1410 - 1411. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |