JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldbeter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldbeter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Koshland, D. E., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 262, Issue 10, 4460-4471, 04, 1987

Energy expenditure in the control of biochemical systems by covalent modification

A Goldbeter and DE Koshland Jr

Regulation by reversible, covalent modification of proteins requires a continuous expenditure of energy, even in a steady-state situation. The cost of this energy drain is evaluated for the case of an effector controlling the modifying enzyme and an effector controlling the demodifying enzyme and for the case of dual control in which an effector activates one of these enzymes and inhibits the other. Energy consumption is determined when the converter enzymes are functioning in the first-order and zero-order domains. The profile of energy expenditure versus fractional protein modification at steady state varies both as a function of the mechanism of control of the converter enzymes and of the kinetic domain in which they operate. This theory allows one to predict the strategies that would minimize energy costs. Dual control appears to provide maximum sensitivity with minimal energy expenditure. The analysis is applied to two experimental systems. Comparison of ATP turnover rates with rates for individual modification enzymes in living systems shows that a significant fraction of the total energy expenditure of an organism is required for the large number of reactions which involve covalent modification of proteins. It is concluded that there will be selection pressure for energy-efficient control of covalent regulation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Qian
Amplifying Signal Transduction Specificity without Multiple Phosphorylation
Biophys. J., February 1, 2003; 84(2): 1410 - 1411.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.