![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 263, Issue 1, 200-209, Jan, 1988
SA Chow, BJ Rao and CM Radding
Department of Human Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
When recA protein promotes homologous pairing and strand exchange involving circular single strands and linear duplex DNA, the protein first polymerizes on the single-stranded DNA to form a nucleoprotein filament which then binds naked duplex DNA to form nucleoprotein networks, the existence of which is independent of homology, but requires the continued presence of recA protein (Tsang, S. S., Chow, S. A., and Radding, C. M. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 3226-3232). Further experiments revealed that within a few minutes after the beginning of homologous pairing and strand exchange, these networks began to be replaced by a distinct set of networks with inverse properties: their formation depended upon homology, but they survived removal of recA protein by a variety of treatments. Formation of this second kind of network required that homology be present specifically at the end of the linear duplex molecule from which strand exchange begins. Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein or phage T4 gene 32 protein largely suppressed the formation of this second population of networks by inactivating the newly formed heteroduplex DNA, which, however, could be reactivated when recA protein was dissociated by incubation at 0 degrees C. We interpret these observations as evidence of reinitiation of strand invasion when recA protein acts in the absence of auxiliary helix-destabilizing proteins. These observations indicate that the nature of the nucleoprotein products of strand exchange determines whether pairing and strand exchange are reversible or not, and they further suggest a new explanation for the way in which E. coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein and gene 32 protein accelerate the apparent forward rate of strand exchange promoted by recA protein, namely by suppressing initiation of the reverse reaction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Eggler, S. L. Lusetti, and M. M. Cox The C Terminus of the Escherichia coli RecA Protein Modulates the DNA Binding Competition with Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 16389 - 16396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kantake, M. V. V. M. Madiraju, T. Sugiyama, and S. C. Kowalczykowski Escherichia coli RecO protein anneals ssDNA complexed with its cognate ssDNA-binding protein: A common step in genetic recombination PNAS, November 26, 2002; 99(24): 15327 - 15332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Wong, S.-K. Chiu, and S. A. Chow The Role of Negative Superhelicity and Length of Homology in the Formation of Paranemic Joints Promoted by RecA Protein J. Biol. Chem., May 15, 1998; 273(20): 12120 - 12127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sugiyama, E. M. Zaitseva, and S. C. Kowalczykowski A Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein Is Needed for Efficient Presynaptic Complex Formation by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 Protein J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 1997; 272(12): 7940 - 7945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Harmon, W. M. Rehrauer, and S. C. Kowalczykowski Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA Protein with LexA Repressor. II. INHIBITION OF DNA STRAND EXCHANGE BY THE UNCLEAVABLE LexA S119A REPRESSOR ARGUES THAT RECOMBINATION AND SOS INDUCTION ARE COMPETITIVE PROCESSES J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 1996; 271(39): 23874 - 23883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |