Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Ryk, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Nazar, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Ryk, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Nazar, R. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 265, Issue 15, 8377-8381, May, 1990

Efficient expression and utilization of mutant 5 S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DI Van Ryk, Y Lee and RN Nazar
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

The expression of mutant 5 S rRNA genes in vivo is examined as a basis for further studies on the control, structure, and function of the ribosomal 5 S RNA. Specific single base substitutions (e.g. positions 98 or 99) or short insertions can result in substantial structural changes that can easily be detected by gel electrophoresis and permit the assay of mutant RNA synthesis and utilization. In addition, the use of high and low copy shuttle vectors as well as alternate growth conditions permits the adjustment of mutant RNA levels in vivo. Despite the high genomic copy number for the 5 S rRNA gene, under optimized conditions as much as 80% of the cellular 5 S RNA can be mutant, and RNA structure analyses indicate that some of these RNAs can readily be assembled into the ribosome structure resulting in an in vivo ribosome population which is also approximately 80% mutant. The results indicate that plasmid integrated 5 S rRNA genes are preferentially expressed and suggest that additional features of the chromosome structure regulate 5 S rRNA gene expression in vivo.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Lee and R. N. Nazar
Terminal Structure Mediates 5 S rRNA Stability and Integration during Ribosome Biogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 6635 - 6641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Lee and R. N. Nazar
Ribosomal 5 S rRNA Maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 1997; 272(24): 15206 - 15212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Lee, Y. F. Melekhovets, and R. N. Nazar
Termination as a Factor in ``Quality Control'' during Ribosome Biogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 1995; 270(47): 28003 - 28005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
C A O'Brien and S L Wolin
A possible role for the 60-kD Ro autoantigen in a discard pathway for defective 5S rRNA precursors.
Genes & Dev., December 1, 1994; 8(23): 2891 - 2903.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement