JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenwalt, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenwalt, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 265, Issue 27, 16296-16299, 09, 1990

Structural, functional, and antigenic differences between bovine heart endothelial CD36 and human platelet CD36

DE Greenwalt, KW Watt, T Hasler, RJ Howard and S Patel
Department of Chemistry, San Jose State University, California 95192- 0101.

Endothelial cell CD36 (glycoprotein IV) has been purified from bovine heart tissue by detergent partitioning and immunoaffinity chromatography. Bovine CD36 differs from human CD36 in its apparent mass (85 versus 88 kDa), primary structure, and immunological cross- reactivity. Of the 18 N-terminal residues identified, 17 conformed to the human CD36 sequence. Mouse monoclonal antibodies E-1 and 8A6 defined bovine- and human-specific epitopes, respectively. Because human CD36 has been identified as a receptor for erythrocytes infected with the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, we examined the ability of bovine CD36 to bind infected erythrocytes. Bovine CD36, unlike human CD36, did not bind infected erythrocytes, suggesting that human CD36-specific structural features are responsible for recognition of the infected erythrocyte ligand.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. Lubick and M. A. Jutila
LTA recognition by bovine {gamma}{delta} T cells involves CD36
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2006; 79(6): 1268 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. P. Wilcox, V. G. Janolino, and H. E. Swaisgood
Isolation and Partial Characterization of CD36 from Skim Milk
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2002; 85(8): 1903 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.