JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 267, Issue 11, 7332-7341, Apr, 1992

C-C-A-G-G-C-m5C-T-G-G. Helical fine structure, hydration, and comparison with C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G

U Heinemann and M Hahn
Institut fur Kristallographie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany.

The self-complementary DNA duplex C-C-A-G-G-C-m5C-T-G-G has been refined against 1.75-A x-ray diffraction data to an R value of 17.4%. In the crystal of space group P6, 10-base pair DNA fragments with characteristic sequence-related fine structure stack end to end to form long antiparallel B-type double helices. As shown by a structure analysis at lower resolution (Heinemann, U., and Alings, C. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 35-43), the overall geometry of C-C-A-G-G-C-m5C-T-G-G is similar to that of the unmethylated analog C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G despite a different crystal environment. The present high resolution structure analysis permits a detailed comparison of the two duplexes and their hydration spheres. Helical parameters are significantly correlated between both molecules, with the exception of the base pair propeller. Sugar pucker and backbone torsion angles alpha, gamma, delta, and chi show similar mean values, but their individual values deviate significantly between duplexes. In contrast, torsion angles beta, epsilon, and zeta change along the strands of both duplexes in much the same way. The effect of single-site methylation on DNA conformation appears to be small and limited to the base pairs directly involved. Methylation tends to push base pairs toward the minor groove of the helix. A regular minor groove hydration pattern involves dual hydrogen bonding of water molecules to O-4' and base atoms of C-C-A-G-G-C-m5C-T- G-G.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Gallais, F. Demay, P. Barath, L. Finot, R. Jurkowska, R. Le Guevel, F. Gay, A. Jeltsch, R. Metivier, and G. Salbert
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Methyl Transferases 3a and 3b Associate with the Nuclear Orphan Receptor COUP-TFI during Gene Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2085 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. M. Elsawy, M. K. Hodgson, and L. S. D. Caves
The physical determinants of the DNA conformational landscape: an analysis of the potential energy surface of single-strand dinucleotides in the conformational space of duplex DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., October 7, 2005; 33(18): 5749 - 5762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Hamelberg, L. D. Williams, and W. D. Wilson
Effect of a neutralized phosphate backbone on the minor groove of B-DNA: molecular dynamics simulation studies
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2002; 30(16): 3615 - 3623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Warmlander, J. E. Sponer, J. Sponer, and M. Leijon
The Influence of the Thymine C5 Methyl Group on Spontaneous Base Pair Breathing in DNA
J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28491 - 28497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Derreumaux, M. Chaoui, G. Tevanian, and S. Fermandjian
Impact of CpG methylation on structure, dynamics and solvation of cAMP DNA responsive element
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2001; 29(11): 2314 - 2326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. J. Weisenberger and L. J. Romano
Cytosine Methylation in a CpG Sequence Leads to Enhanced Reactivity with Benzo[a]pyrene Diol Epoxide That Correlates with a Conformational Change
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 1999; 274(34): 23948 - 23955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Dornberger, M. Leijon, and H. Fritzsche
High Base Pair Opening Rates in Tracts of GC Base Pairs
J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 1999; 274(11): 6957 - 6962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Hodges-Garcia and P. J. Hagerman
Investigation of the Influence of Cytosine Methylation on DNA Flexibility
J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 1995; 270(1): 197 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.