JBC Biosymposia, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ismail, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brock, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ismail, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brock, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 268, Issue 29, 21618-21625, 10, 1993

Binding of lactoferrin and transferrin to the human promonocytic cell line U937. Effect on iron uptake and release

M Ismail and JH Brock
University Department of Immunology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.

We have compared the ability of lactoferrin and transferrin to interact with and donate iron to the monocytic cell line U937. About 10 times more lactoferrin was bound than transferrin, but most lactoferrin bound nonspecifically, and the degree of specific binding was similar for both proteins (2-3 x 10(6) sites/cell). The binding affinity for lactoferrin (83 nM) was about 4-fold lower than for transferrin (21 nM). Lactoferrin did not inhibit binding of transferrin, or vice versa. Binding of lactoferrin was not inhibited by 30 mM glucose or fucose nor by incubating the cells with heparinase. Transferrin, but not lactoferrin, was internalized, and 3 mM primaquine caused intracellular accumulation of transferrin but not lactoferrin. The cells rapidly acquired iron from transferrin, but uptake from lactoferrin was 10-fold slower and probably resulted from transfer of 59Fe from lactoferrin to unlabeled transferrin during culture. Lactoferrin, but not transferrin, released iron to the extracellular medium when bound to U937 cells. Lactoferrin inhibited cellular uptake of iron from Fe-nitrilotriacetate but not from transferrin. It is concluded that transferrin, but not lactoferrin, acts as an iron donor to U937 cells. Lactoferrin may regulate uptake of potentially toxic non-transferrin-bound iron.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
O. Olakanmi, G. T. Rasmussen, T. S. Lewis, J. B. Stokes, J. D. Kemp, and B. E. Britigan
Multivalent Metal-Induced Iron Acquisition from Transferrin and Lactoferrin by Myeloid Cells
J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 2076 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. L. Thomas, W. Xu, and T. T. Ardon
Immobilized Lactoferrin Is a Stimulus for Eosinophil Activation
J. Immunol., July 15, 2002; 169(2): 993 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.