Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Inouye, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Inouye, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 268, Issue 31, 23128-23131, 11, 1993

Effect of the relative position of the UGA codon to the unique secondary structure in the fdhF mRNA on its decoding by selenocysteinyl tRNA in Escherichia coli

GF Chen, L Fang and M Inouye
Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854.

The fdhF mRNA for formate dehydrogenase H of Escherichia coli contains a UGA codon at position 140. This termination codon is decoded by selenocysteinyl tRNA (the selC product) with the aid of its own specific elongation factor, SelB. For this decoding, a unique secondary structure immediately downstream of the UGA codon has been shown to be essential (Zinoni, F., Heider, J., and Bock, A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 4660-4664). We examined the positional effect of the UGA codon relative to the secondary structure on its decoding using a fdhF-lacZ fusion gene. When the UGA codon was separated by one codon (position -1) from the secondary structure, the UGA decoding, as measured by the beta-galactosidase activity, dropped to approximately 76% of the normal level but was still almost as fully dependent upon selC and selenium in the culture medium as in the case of the UGA codon in the normal position (position 0). However, when the UGA codon was separated by two codons (position -2), the decoding level further dropped to 20% of the normal level, and in addition, became dependent only on selC but independent of selenium. When the UGA codon was further separated by three codons (position -3), the decoding level of UGA (-3) became higher than the decoding of UGA (-2) and was completely independent from selC and selenium, indicating that the UGA codon was nonspecifically suppressed. A similar nonspecific suppression was observed for the UGA codon at position -4, but at a lower level. When two UGA codons were tandemly placed at positions 0 and -1, they were still able to be decoded at 17% of the normal level in a selC- and selenium-dependent manner. In the absence of the SelB function, the decoding level of UGA(0) dropped to 1.6% of the normal level, whereas the UGA(-1) decoding dropped to 7.5%. These results indicate that the UGA codon at position 0 is not only most effectively decoded by selenocysteinyl tRNA but also tightly blocked from its nonspecific suppression in the absence of any components required for the decoding.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Zhang and V. N. Gladyshev
An algorithm for identification of bacterial selenocysteine insertion sequence elements and selenoprotein genes
Bioinformatics, June 1, 2005; 21(11): 2580 - 2589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. E. Sandman, D. F. Tardiff, L. A. Neely, and C. J. Noren
Revised Escherichia coli selenocysteine insertion requirements determined by in vivo screening of combinatorial libraries of SECIS variants
Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2003; 31(8): 2234 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
E. GOLDMAN, M. KORUS, and W. MANDECKI
Efficiencies of translation in three reading frames of unusual non-ORF sequences isolated from phage display
FASEB J, March 1, 2000; 14(3): 603 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. E. Sandman and C. J. Noren
The efficiency of Escherichia coli selenocysteine insertion is influenced by the immediate downstream nucleotide
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2000; 28(3): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. R. Copeland and D. M. Driscoll
Purification, Redox Sensitivity, and RNA Binding Properties of SECIS-binding Protein 2, a Protein Involved in Selenoprotein Biosynthesis
J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 1999; 274(36): 25447 - 25454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. J. Klug, A. Huttenhofer, M. Kromayer, and M. Famulok
In vitro and in vivo characterization of novel mRNA motifs that bind special elongation factor SelB
PNAS, June 24, 1997; 94(13): 6676 - 6681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement