JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koudelka, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koudelka, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, C. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 268, Issue 32, 23812-23817, 11, 1993

Differential recognition of OR1 and OR3 by bacteriophage 434 repressor and Cro

GB Koudelka and CY Lam
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo 14260.

The developmental decisions of bacteriophage 434 depend on the ability of 434 repressor and Cro to bind OR1 and OR3 with different relative affinities; repressor binds OR1 tighter than OR3, whereas Cro slightly prefers OR3 over OR1. Studies with operator mutants show that repressor's lower relative affinity for OR3 results from a deviation in the sequence of OR3 from consensus; an A-->G change at position 4 in one half-site (OR1: A-C-A-A-A-C-T-T-T-C-T-T-G-T; OR3: A-C-A-G-T-T-T-T-T- C-T-T-G-T). Similar experiments show that Cro binds operators containing either A.T or G.C bases pairs at position 4 equally well, but cannot bind operators containing C.G or T.A base pairs at this position. A Gln33-->Ala mutation in 434 repressor diminishes, but does not eliminate, its ability to distinguish between purines at position 4. This shows that a glutamine at amino acid 33 is not the sole determinant of repressor's position 4 specificity. Changing Gln33-- >Leu, the amino acid at the homologous position in Cro, does not confer "Cro-like" position 4 base specificity on repressor. Similarly, a Cro protein bearing Gln at this position does not exhibit repressor's position 4 base preferences. The residual specificities of these mutant proteins indicates that in each protein, more than 1 amino acid is responsible for recognizing bases at position 4. These were identified by analyzing the binding specificities of multiply mutated repressors, in vitro. The types of substitutions made were guided by sequence homologies between 434 repressor and Cro. At least three mutations are needed to eliminate repressor's position 4 base specificity; Gln33-- >Ala, Glu32-->Gln, and Thr27-->Lys, although no set of amino acid substitutions in repressor was able to confer Cro-like position 4 specificity to repressor. These results indicate that at least the amino acids at these positions are involved in recognition of the position 4 base. Other evidence suggests that Cro and repressor use identical amino acids present at homologous positions in the DNA recognition helix in different ways.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
G. Durante-Rodriguez, M. T. Zamarro, J. L. Garcia, E. Diaz, and M. Carmona
New insights into the BzdR-mediated transcriptional regulation of the anaerobic catabolism of benzoate in Azoarcus sp. CIB
Microbiology, January 1, 2008; 154(1): 306 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. van Dijk, A. D. J. van Dijk, V. Hsu, R. Boelens, and A. M. J. J. Bonvin
Information-driven protein-DNA docking using HADDOCK: it is a matter of flexibility
Nucleic Acids Res., July 4, 2006; 34(11): 3317 - 3325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. L. Barragan, B. Blazquez, M. T. Zamarro, J. M. Mancheno, J. L. Garcia, E. Diaz, and M. Carmona
BzdR, a Repressor That Controls the Anaerobic Catabolism of Benzoate in Azoarcus sp. CIB, Is the First Member of a New Subfamily of Transcriptional Regulators
J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10683 - 10694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
K. Fromknecht, P. D. Vogel, and J. G. Wise
Combinatorial Redesign of the DNA Binding Specificity of a Prokaryotic Helix-Turn-Helix Repressor
J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2003; 185(2): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Xu and G. B. Koudelka
DNA-based Positive Control Mutants in the Binding Site Sequence of 434 Repressor
J. Biol. Chem., September 11, 1998; 273(37): 24165 - 24172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Bell and G. B. Koudelka
How 434 Repressor Discriminates Between O(R)1 and O(R)3
J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 1995; 270(3): 1205 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.