HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hirschberg, B. T. Articles by Schimerlik, M. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hirschberg, B. T. Articles by Schimerlik, M. I. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 269, Issue 42, 26127-26135, 10, 1994

A kinetic model for oxotremorine M binding to recombinant porcine m2 muscarinic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells

BT Hirschberg and MI Schimerlik
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331.

The kinetic mechanism of super high affinity [3H]oxotremorine M binding to porcine m2 muscarinic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells was examined. In cell lines expressing low receptor numbers (10(4) binding sites/cell) and in high expression (10(6) sites/cell) cell lines treated with cholate, [3H]oxotremorine M association and dissociation kinetics were monophasic. The reciprocal relaxation time for the association reaction was independent of [3H]oxotremorine M concentration and equaled the dissociation rate constant consistent with a special case for a mechanism involving a protein conformational change followed by ligand binding. Membranes from high expression cell lines and porcine atrial membranes showed complex kinetic behavior. Two kinetic phases were observed for [3H]oxotremorine M association, and both reciprocal relaxation times were independent of ligand concentration. The number of kinetic phases and their relative amplitudes seen in dissociation experiments were dependent on whether dissociation was initiated by dilution or by addition of unlabeled ligand(s) as well as on the fractional saturation of the receptor. Computer simulations of the data led to a model consistent with the existence of asymmetric receptor dimers as well as monomers and the ligand-dependent interconversion of fully occupied dimers and monomers.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Goin and N. M. Nathanson Quantitative Analysis of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Homo- and Heterodimerization in Live Cells: REGULATION OF RECEPTOR DOWN-REGULATION BY HETERODIMERIZATION J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5416 - 5425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vivo, H. Lin, and P. G. Strange Investigation of Cooperativity in the Binding of Ligands to the D2 Dopamine Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2006; 69(1): 226 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Agrawal, X. Lu, J. Qingwen, Z. VanHorn-Ali, I. V. Nicolescu, D. H. McDermott, P. M. Murphy, and G. Alkhatib Role for CCR5{Delta}32 Protein in Resistance to R5, R5X4, and X4 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Primary CD4+ Cells J. Virol., March 1, 2004; 78(5): 2277 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Christopoulos and T. Kenakin G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 323 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-Y. Zeng and J. Wess Identification and Molecular Characterization of m3 Muscarinic Receptor Dimers J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 1999; 274(27): 19487 - 19497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bai, S. Trivedi, and E. M. Brown Dimerization of the Extracellular Calcium-sensing Receptor (CaR) on the Cell Surface of CaR-transfected HEK293 Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 4, 1998; 273(36): 23605 - 23610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Hebert, S. Moffett, J.-P. Morello, T. P. Loisel, D. G. Bichet, C. Barret, and M. Bouvier A Peptide Derived from a beta 2-Adrenergic Receptor Transmembrane Domain Inhibits Both Receptor Dimerization and Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 5, 1996; 271(27): 16384 - 16392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Wreggett and J. W. Wells Cooperativity Manifest in the Binding Properties of Purified Cardiac Muscarinic Receptors J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 1995; 270(38): 22488 - 22499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Vogel, V. A. Mosser, D. A. Bulseco, and M. I. Schimerlik Porcine m2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor-Effector Coupling in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 30, 1995; 270(26): 15485 - 15493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]