Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marincs, F.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marincs, F.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 270, Number 21, Issue of May 26, pp. 12339-12342, 1995
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Divergent Transcription and a Remote Operator Play a Role in Control of Expression of a Nopaline Catabolism Promoter in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Ferenc Marincs , Derek W. R. White

The nocP-nocR divergent gene arrangement of the nopaline catabolism (noc) operon of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid pTiT37 was examined with respect to the expression of the nocP promoter. Under repressive conditions, i.e. in the absence of nopaline, four distinct levels of P expression were observed. The lowest level of expression, i.e. full repression, was detected in the presence of the NocR repressor, together with the remote noc operator and productive transcription from the divergent nocR promoter. The next level was observed in the absence of either the NocR protein or of the operator or of both. The third level was detected when abortive transcription from the nocR promoter occurred, irrespective of the presence or absence of the NocR protein. The highest level of P expression was observed in the absence of both productive transcription from P and the operator sequence, whether or not the NocR protein was present. Under inductive conditions, i.e. in the presence of nopaline, expression of P was activated if both the NocR protein and the operator were present. Absence of either NocR or the operator resulted in lack of inducibility of the nocP promoter. Transcription from the divergent nocR promoter had no influence on the activation of P. It was also found that the absence of the operator affected plasmid supercoiling in vivo. The results suggest that DNA topology has a role in the regulation of the nocP promoter.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement