Volume 271, Number 37,
Issue of September 13, 1996
pp. 22305-22309
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Role of the Active Site Gate of Glycogen Phosphorylase in
Allosteric Inhibition and Substrate Binding
(Received for publication, April 26, 1996, and in revised form, June 11, 1996)
Jenny L.
Buchbinder
and
Robert J.
Fletterick
From the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of
California, San Francisco, California 94143-0448
The functional role in allosteric regulation of a
flexible loop (residues 280-288) located near the active site of
muscle glycogen phosphorylase was investigated. Mutations were made in
residues 283-285 based on crystallographic studies that indicate that
the loop functions as a gate controlling access of substrates to the
active site and that these specific residues play distinct roles in
mimicking the substrate and binding inhibitors when the enzyme is in an
inactive conformation. Substitution of Ala or Asn for Asp-283, the
putative substrate mimic, results in a 15-fold decrease in
Vmax, a 10-fold decrease in the
S0.5 for glucose 1-phosphate, a 10-fold increase in the
Ka for AMP, and a 10-20-fold increase in the
Ki for glucose. Substitution of Ala for Asn-284,
which normally forms a hydrogen bond with the inhibitor glucose,
reduces Vmax 3-fold, increases the
Ki for glucose 2-fold, but has little effect on AMP
or glucose 1-phosphate binding or cooperativity. Substitution of Asp at
284, on the other hand, reduces Vmax 10-fold,
elevates the Ki for glucose 10-fold, decreases AMP
cooperativity, but has little effect on the affinity of AMP or the
cooperativity and binding of glucose 1-phosphate. Substitution of Leu
for Phe-285, which forms aromatic stacking interactions with purine
inhibitors, reduces Vmax 2-fold, decreases the
affinity for caffeine at least 10-fold, raises the
Ka for AMP 3-fold, and decreases AMP cooperativity
but has little effect on glucose 1-phosphate binding or cooperativity.
The results of the mutagenesis studies show the importance of the
280's loop for inhibitor binding and modulation of substrate affinity
and suggest a role for the loop in allosteric activation. The
propagation of allosteric effects across the domain interface may
depend upon specific contacts between residues of the 280's loop and
the C-terminal domain.