JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johanning, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johanning, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 44, Issue of November 1, 1996 pp. 27871-27878
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Processing Site Blockade Results in More Efficient Conversion of Proenkephalin to Active Opioid Peptides

(Received for publication, April 17, 1996, and in revised form, July 8, 1996)

Karla Johanning , John P. Mathis and Iris Lindberg

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Prohormones are known to be processed at various cleavage sites in a defined temporal order, suggesting the possibility of sequential unfolding of processing sites. In order to investigate whether sequential processing at predefined sites is in fact required for proper processing, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to block known initial cleavage sites within proenkephalin. Pulse-chase/immunoprecipitation experiments were employed to analyze the fate of mutant and native proenkephalins in stably transfected AtT-20 cells. While processing did not occur at blockaded sites, surprisingly, overall processing of mutant proenkephalins proceeded efficiently, and alternative sites were chosen. When compared with native proenkephalin, processing of mutant proenkephalins occurred more slowly at early stages and more quickly at later stages. Experiments employing endoglycosidase H indicated that the early slow processing of mutant proenkephalins may be due to delays in intracellular transport. Metabolic labeling studies showed that more efficient production of bioactive opioids occurred in all processing site blockade mutants examined; these results were confirmed using several different radioimmunoassays of stored peptide products. We conclude that efficient processing of prohormone precursors does not require a specific temporal order of processing events. The fact that mutant proenkephalins were more fully processed than native proenkephalin may provide a route for more efficient production of opioid peptides in applications for chronic pain treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
B. A. Barron
Cardiac Opioids
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2000; 224(1): 1 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. A Barron
Opioid peptides and the heart
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1999; 43(1): 13 - 16.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Johanning, M. A. Juliano, L. Juliano, C. Lazure, N. S. Lamango, D. F. Steiner, and I. Lindberg
Specificity of Prohormone Convertase 2 on Proenkephalin and Proenkephalin-related Substrates
J. Biol. Chem., August 28, 1998; 273(35): 22672 - 22680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Zhu, L. Muller, R. E. Mains, and I. Lindberg
Structural Elements of PC2 Required for Interaction with Its Helper Protein 7B2
J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 1998; 273(2): 1158 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.