JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lackmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lackmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 26, Issue of June 27, 1997 pp. 16521-16530
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Ligand for EPH-related Kinase (LERK) 7 Is the Preferred High Affinity Ligand for the HEK Receptor

(Received for publication, December 26, 1996, and in revised form, February 24, 1997)

Martin Lackmann Dagger , Richard J. Mann , Lucy Kravets Dagger , Fiona M. Smith par , Tamara A. Bucci ** , Kelly F. Maxwell , Geoffrey J. Howlett Dagger Dagger , Jane E. Olsson ** , Tim Vanden Bos , Douglas Pat Cerretti and Andrew W. Boyd par

From the Cooperative Research Centre for Cellular Growth Factors, Dagger  Growth Regulation Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Melbourne Branch),  Cancer Research Unit and ** Lions Cancer Research Laboratory, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Post Office, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria 3050, Australia, the Dagger Dagger  Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, §§ Immunex Corporation, Seattle, Washington 98101, and the par  Queensland Institute for Medical Research, The Bancroft Centre, Post Office, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland 4029, Australia

HEK is a member of the EPH-like receptor tyrosine kinase family, which appear to have roles in development and oncogenesis. Recently, we purified a soluble HEK ligand which is also a ligand (AL1) for the HEK-related receptor EHK1. Promiscuity appears to be a characteristic feature of interactions between the EPH-like receptors and their ligands, termed ligands for EPH-related kinases (LERKs). This prompted us to analyze the interactions between the HEK exodomain and fusion proteins comprising candidate LERKs and the Fc portion of human IgG1 (Fc) or a FLAGTM-peptide tag by surface plasmon resonance, size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography, sedimentation equilibrium, and transphosphorylation. Our results indicate that AL1/LERK7 is the preferred high-affinity ligand for HEK, forming a stable 1:1 complex with a dissociation constant of 12 nM. As expected the apparent affinities of bivalent fusion proteins of LERKs and the Fc portion of human IgG1 had significantly reduced dissociation rates compared with their monovalent, FLAGTM-tagged derivatives. High-avidity binding of monovalent ligands can be achieved by antibody-mediated cross-linking of monovalent ligands and with LERK7 results in specific phosphorylation of the receptor. By extrapolation, our findings indicate that some of the reported LERK-receptor interactions are a consequence of the use of bivalent ligand or receptor constructs and may be functionally irrelevant.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
M. Lackmann and A. W. Boyd
Eph, a Protein Family Coming of Age: More Confusion, Insight, or Complexity?
Sci. Signal., April 15, 2008; 1(15): re2 - re2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
K. B. Pabbisetty, X. Yue, C. Li, J.-P. Himanen, R. Zhou, D. B. Nikolov, and L. Hu
Kinetic analysis of the binding of monomeric and dimeric ephrins to Eph receptors: Correlation to function in a growth cone collapse assay
Protein Sci., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 355 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Vearing, F.-T. Lee, S. Wimmer-Kleikamp, V. Spirkoska, C. To, C. Stylianou, M. Spanevello, M. Brechbiel, A. W. Boyd, A. M. Scott, et al.
Concurrent Binding of Anti-EphA3 Antibody and Ephrin-A5 Amplifies EphA3 Signaling and Downstream Responses: Potential as EphA3-Specific Tumor-Targeting Reagents
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6745 - 6754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Day, C. To, J.-P. Himanen, F. M. Smith, D. B. Nikolov, A. W. Boyd, and M. Lackmann
Three Distinct Molecular Surfaces in Ephrin-A5 Are Essential for a Functional Interaction with EphA3
J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26526 - 26532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Koolpe, R. Burgess, M. Dail, and E. B. Pasquale
EphB Receptor-binding Peptides Identified by Phage Display Enable Design of an Antagonist with Ephrin-like Affinity
J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17301 - 17311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. M. Smith, C. Vearing, M. Lackmann, H. Treutlein, J. Himanen, K. Chen, A. Saul, D. Nikolov, and A. W. Boyd
Dissecting the EphA3/Ephrin-A5 Interactions Using a Novel Functional Mutagenesis Screen
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9522 - 9531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
S. H. Wimmer-Kleikamp, P. W. Janes, A. Squire, P. I.H. Bastiaens, and M. Lackmann
Recruitment of Eph receptors into signaling clusters does not require ephrin contact
J. Cell Biol., March 1, 2004; 164(5): 661 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
J. Wilson-Annan, L. A. O'Reilly, S. A. Crawford, G. Hausmann, J. G. Beaumont, L. P. Parma, L. Chen, M. Lackmann, T. Lithgow, M. G. Hinds, et al.
Proapoptotic BH3-only proteins trigger membrane integration of prosurvival Bcl-w and neutralize its activity
J. Cell Biol., September 1, 2003; 162(5): 877 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
I. D. Lawrenson, S. H. Wimmer-Kleikamp, P. Lock, S. M. Schoenwaelder, M. Down, A. W. Boyd, P. F. Alewood, and M. Lackmann
Ephrin-A5 induces rounding, blebbing and de-adhesion of EphA3-expressing 293T and melanoma cells by CrkII and Rho-mediated signalling
J. Cell Sci., January 3, 2002; 115(5): 1059 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
A. W. Boyd and M. Lackmann
Signals from Eph and Ephrin Proteins: A Developmental Tool Kit
Sci. Signal., December 11, 2001; 2001(112): re20 - re20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Y. Li, Z. Mi, Y. Feng, C. F. McTiernan, R. Zhou, P. D. Robbins, S. C. Watkins, and A. M. Feldman
Differential effects of overexpression of two forms of ephrin-A5 on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2738 - H2746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Hattori, M. Osterfield, and J. G. Flanagan
Regulated Cleavage of a Contact-Mediated Axon Repellent
Science, August 25, 2000; 289(5483): 1360 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
A. Davy, N. W. Gale, E. W. Murray, R. A. Klinghoffer, P. Soriano, C. Feuerstein, and S. M. Robbins
Compartmentalized signaling by GPI-anchored ephrin-A5 requires the Fyn tyrosine kinase to regulate cellular adhesion
Genes & Dev., December 1, 1999; 13(23): 3125 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
N Holder and R Klein
Eph receptors and ephrins: effectors of morphogenesis
Development, January 5, 1999; 126(10): 2033 - 2044.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. C.L. Schuh and P. J. Morrissey
Development of a Recombinant Growth Factor and Fusion Protein: Lessons from GM-CSF
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1999; 27(1): 72 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Lackmann, A. C. Oates, M. Dottori, F. M. Smith, C. Do, M. Power, L. Kravets, and A. W. Boyd
Distinct Subdomains of the EphA3 Receptor Mediate Ligand Binding and Receptor Dimerization
J. Biol. Chem., August 7, 1998; 273(32): 20228 - 20237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.