HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Takahashi, T. Articles by Raghow, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Takahashi, T. Articles by Raghow, R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Volume 272, Number 36, Issue of September 5, 1997 pp. 22667-22678
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

A Minimal Murine Msx-1 Gene Promoter
ORGANIZATION OF ITS cis-REGULATORY MOTIFS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION IN CELLS IN CULTURE AND IN TRANSGENIC MICE

(Received for publication, June 5, 1996, and in revised form, June 13, 1997)

From the Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38163 and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38104

To dissect the cis-regulatory elements of the murine Msx-1 promoter, which lacks a conventional TATA element, a putative Msx-1 promoter DNA fragment (from 1282 to +106 base pairs (bp)) or its congeners containing site-specific alterations were fused to luciferase reporter and introduced into NIH3T3 and C₂C₁₂ cells, and the expression of luciferase was assessed in transient expression assays. The functional consequences of the sequential 5 deletions of the promotor revealed that multiple positive and negative regulatory elements participate in regulating transcription of the Msx-1 gene. Surprisingly, however, the optimal expression of Msx-1 promoter in either NIH3T3 or C₂C₁₂ cells required only 165 bp of the upstream sequence to warrant detailed examination of its structure. Therefore, the functional consequences of site-specific deletions and point mutations of the cis-acting elements of the minimal Msx-1 promoter were systematically examined. Concomitantly, potential transcriptional factor(s) interacting with the cis-acting elements of the minimal promoter were also studied by gel electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting. Combined analyses of the minimal promoter by DNase I footprinting, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and super shift assays with specific antibodies revealed that 5-flanking regions from 161 to 154 and from 26 to 13 of the Msx-1 promoter contains an authentic E box (proximal E box), capable of binding a protein immunologically related to the upstream stimulating factor 1 (USF-1) and a GC-rich sequence motif which can bind to Sp1 (proximal Sp1), respectively. Additionally, we observed that the promoter activation was seriously hampered if the proximal E box was removed or mutated, and the promoter activity was eliminated completely if the proximal Sp1 site was similarly altered. Absolute dependence of the Msx-1 minimal promoter on Sp1 could be demonstrated by transient expression assays in the Sp1-deficient Drosophila cell line cotransfected with Msx-1-luciferase and an Sp1 expression vector pPacSp1. The transgenic mice embryos containing 165/106-bp Msx-1 promoter-LacZ DNA in their genomes abundantly expressed -galactosidase in maxillae and mandibles and in the cellular primordia involved in the formation of the meninges and the bones of the skull. Thus, the truncated murine Msx-1 promoter can target expression of a heterologous gene in the craniofacial tissues of transgenic embryos known for high level of expression of the endogenous Msx-1 gene and found to be severely defective in the Msx-1 knock-out mice.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Dietrich, R. Shanmugasundaram, S. E, and I. Dragatsis Congenital hydrocephalus associated with abnormal subcommissural organ in mice lacking huntingtin in Wnt1 cell lineages Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Imayoshi, T. Shimogori, T. Ohtsuka, and R. Kageyama Hes genes and neurogenin regulate non-neural versus neural fate specification in the dorsal telencephalic midline Development, August 1, 2008; 135(15): 2531 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Herr, G. Korniychuk, Y. Yamamoto, K. Grubisic, and M. Oelgeschlager Regulation of TGF-{beta} signalling by N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase-like 1 Development, May 15, 2008; 135(10): 1813 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ogawa, H. Kapadia, J. Q. Feng, R. Raghow, H. Peters, and R. N. D'Souza Functional Consequences of Interactions between Pax9 and Msx1 Genes in Normal and Abnormal Tooth Development J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18363 - 18369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Tribulo, M. J. Aybar, V. H. Nguyen, M. C. Mullins, and R. Mayor Regulation of Msx genes by a Bmp gradient is essential for neural crest specification Development, December 29, 2003; 130(26): 6441 - 6452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y Zhang, Z Zhang, X Zhao, X Yu, Y Hu, B Geronimo, S. Fromm, and Y. Chen A new function of BMP4: dual role for BMP4 in regulation of Sonic hedgehog expression in the mouse tooth germ Development, January 4, 2000; 127(7): 1431 - 1443. [Abstract] [PDF]