Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekena, K.
Right arrow Articles by Katzenellenbogen, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekena, K.
Right arrow Articles by Katzenellenbogen, B. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vol. 273, Issue 2, 693-699, January 9, 1998

Determinants of Ligand Specificity of Estrogen Receptor-alpha : Estrogen versus Androgen Discrimination

Kirk EkenaDagger , John A. Katzenellenbogen§, and Benita S. KatzenellenbogenDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and the § Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

We have been interested in understanding how the estrogen receptor (ER) binds estrogens and discriminates between different classes of steroids with closely related structures. Using insights from our prior studies on ER and from sequence comparisons of steroid receptors, we identified three residues in the hormone-binding domain of the human ER, Leu345, Thr347, and Glu353, that we considered were likely to be involved in steroid A-ring recognition and therefore estrogen versus androgen discrimination. We then tested the effect on ER activity of mutating these ER residues to the corresponding androgen receptor residues. Specifically, we examined the ability of the mutant receptors to bind and be activated by 17beta -estradiol and three different androgens. No change in receptor activity was observed with the T347N mutation, while the L345S mutation greatly reduced ER activity in response to all ligands. Interestingly, the E353Q substitution behaved as expected, causing a 9-fold reduction in the transactivation potency of estradiol and a concomitant 10-140-fold increase in the transactivation potency of different androgens. These reciprocal changes in the transcriptional effectiveness of estrogens and androgens correlated with a decreased affinity of the E353Q ER for estradiol binding and an increased affinity for androgen binding. Therefore, amino acid Glu353 appears to be playing a significant role in binding the A-ring phenolic group of estradiol and in receptor discrimination between estrogens and the most closely structurally related steroids, androgens. Based on this data and our earlier observations, we propose a model for the orientation of ligand within the binding pocket of ER in which the A-ring 3-phenol of estradiol is hydrogen bonded to Glu353 in helix-3 and the 17beta -hydroxyl of estradiol is hydrogen bonded to His524 in helix-11. Our findings with estrogen and androgen suggest that this orientation of the steroid in the ligand-binding pocket, with the steroid A-ring in contact with helix-3 and the D-ring in contact with helix-11 residues, is likely to be general for all the steroid hormone receptors.


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. H. Herynk and S. A. W. Fuqua
Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 869 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Chen, B. S. Katzenellenbogen, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and H. Zhao
Directed Evolution of Human Estrogen Receptor Variants with Significantly Enhanced Androgen Specificity and Affinity
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33855 - 33864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. B. Hawkins and P. Thomas
The Unusual Binding Properties of the Third Distinct Teleost Estrogen Receptor Subtype ER{beta}a Are Accompanied by Highly Conserved Amino Acid Changes in the Ligand Binding Domain
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2968 - 2977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Furuta, A. K. Suzuki, S. Taneda, K. Kamata, H. Hayashi, Y. Mori, C. Li, G. Watanabe, and K. Taya
Estrogenic Activities of Nitrophenols in Diesel Exhaust Particles
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1527 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Shi and S.-X. Lin
Cofactor Hydrogen Bonding onto the Protein Main Chain Is Conserved in the Short Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Family and Contributes to Nicotinamide Orientation
J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16778 - 16785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Sun, J. Baudry, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Molecular Basis for the Subtype Discrimination of the Estrogen Receptor-{beta}-Selective Ligand, Diarylpropionitrile
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2003; 17(2): 247 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
E. C. Henry and T. A. Gasiewicz
Agonist but Not Antagonist Ligands Induce Conformational Change in the Mouse Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor as Detected by Partial Proteolysis
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 392 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. Yin, Y. He, M. A. Perera, S. S. Hong, C. Marhefka, N. Stourman, L. Kirkovsky, D. D. Miller, and J. T. Dalton
Key Structural Features of Nonsteroidal Ligands for Binding and Activation of the Androgen Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Poujol, S. Lumbroso, B. Terouanne, J.-M. A. Lobaccaro, W. Bourguet, and C. Sultan
Pathophysiology of Androgen Insensitivity Syndromes: Molecular and Structural Approaches of Natural and Engineered Androgen Receptor Mutations at Amino Acid 743
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5793 - 5800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Maggiolini, O. Donze, E. Jeannin, S. Ando, and D. Picard
Adrenal Androgens Stimulate the Proliferation of Breast Cancer Cells as Direct Activators of Estrogen Receptor {{alpha}}
Cancer Res., October 1, 1999; 59(19): 4864 - 4869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Elbrecht, Y. Chen, A. Adams, J. Berger, P. Griffin, T. Klatt, B. Zhang, J. Menke, G. Zhou, R. G. Smith, et al.
L-764406 Is a Partial Agonist of Human Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma . THE ROLE OF CYS313 IN LIGAND BINDING
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 7913 - 7922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement