HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klok, E. J. Articles by Lubsen, N. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klok, E. J. Articles by Lubsen, N. H. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 27, 17206-17215, July 3, 1998

Regulation of Expression within a Gene Family
THE CASE OF THE RAT B- AND D-CRYSTALLIN PROMOTERS

From the Department of Molecular Biology, University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands

The six closely related and clustered rat -crystallin genes, the A- to F-crystallin genes, are simultaneously activated in the embryonic lens but differentially shut down during postnatal development with the B-crystallin gene, the last one to be active. We show here that developmental silencing of the D-crystallin promoter correlates with delayed demethylation during lens fiber cell differentiation. Methylation silencing of the D-crystallin promoter is a general effect and does not require the methylation of a specific CpG, nor does methylation interfere with factor binding to the proximal activator. In later development, the D-crystallin promoter is also shut down earlier by a repressor that footprints to the 91/78 region. A factor with identical properties is present in brain. Hence, a ubiquitous factor has been recruited as a developmental regulator by the lens. All -crystallin promoters tested contain upstream silencers, but at least the B-crystallin silencer is distinct from the D-crystallin silencer. The -crystallin promoters were found to share a proximal activator (the -box; around 50), which behaves as a MARE. The B-box is recognized with much lower avidity than the D-box. By swapping elements between the B- and the D-crystallin promoter, we show that activation by the B-box requires a directly adjacent 46/38 AP-1 consensus site. These experiments also uncovered another positive element in the D-crystallin promoter, around 10. In the context of the D-crystallin promoter, this element is redundant; in the context of the B-crystallin promoter, it can replace the 46/38 element.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Yamamoto, M. Kyo, T. Kamiya, T. Tanaka, J. D. Engel, H. Motohashi, and M. Yamamoto Predictive base substitution rules that determine the binding and transcriptional specificity of Maf recognition elements Genes Cells, June 1, 2006; 11(6): 575 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Weston, A. Wong, J. P. Hall, M. E.P. Goad, R. A. Flavell, and R. J. Davis JNK initiates a cytokine cascade that causes Pax2 expression and closure of the optic fissure Genes & Dev., May 15, 2003; 17(10): 1271 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Civil, S. T. van Genesen, and N. H. Lubsen c-Maf, the {gamma}D-crystallin Maf-responsive element and growth factor regulation Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2002; 30(4): 975 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Carosa, Z. Kozmik, J. E. Rall, and J. Piatigorsky Structure and Expression of the Scallop Omega -Crystallin Gene. EVIDENCE FOR CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF PROMOTER SEQUENCES J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 656 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. G. Ilagan, A. Cvekl, M. Kantorow, J. Piatigorsky, and C. M. Sax Regulation of alpha A-crystallin Gene Expression. LENS SPECIFICITY ACHIEVED THROUGH THE DIFFERENTIAL PLACEMENT OF SIMILAR TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL ELEMENTS IN MOUSE AND CHICKEN J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 1999; 274(28): 19973 - 19978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]