JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Abdulaev, N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Abdulaev, N. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 21437-21442, July 23, 1999

Folding and Assembly in Rhodopsin
EFFECT OF MUTATIONS IN THE SIXTH TRANSMEMBRANE HELIX ON THE CONFORMATION OF THE THIRD CYTOPLASMIC LOOP

Kevin D. Ridge, Tony Ngo, Stephen S. J. Lee, and Najmoutin G. Abdulaev

From the Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850

Previous studies on bovine opsin folding and assembly have identified an amino-terminal fragment, EF(1-232), which folds and inserts into a membrane only after coexpression with its complementary carboxyl-terminal fragment, EF(233-348). To further characterize this interaction, EF(1-232) production was examined upon coexpression with carboxyl-terminal fragments of varying length and/or amino acid composition. These included fragments with incremental deletions of the third cytoplasmic loop (TH(241-348) and EF(249-348)), a fragment composed of the third cytoplasmic loop and sixth transmembrane helix (HF(233-280)), a fragment composed of the sixth and seventh transmembrane helices (FG(249-312)), and EF(233-348) and TH(241-348) fragments with Pro-267 or Trp-265 mutations. Although EF(1-232) production was independent of the third cytoplasmic loop and carboxyl-terminal tail, both the sixth and seventh transmembrane helices were essential. The effects of mutations in the sixth transmembrane helix on EF(1-232) expression were dependent on the length of the third cytoplasmic loop. Although Pro-267 mutations in EF(233-348) failed to stabilize EF(1-232) expression, their introduction into TH(241-348) was without discernible effects. However, Trp-265 substitutions in the EF(233-348) and TH(241-348) fragments conferred significant EF(1-232) production. Therefore, key residues in the transmembrane helices may exert their effects on opsin folding, assembly, and/or function by influencing the conformation of the connecting loops.


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. G. Abdulaev, T. Ngo, R. Chen, Z. Lu, and K. D. Ridge
Functionally Discrete Mimics of Light-activated Rhodopsin Identified through Expression of Soluble Cytoplasmic Domains
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39354 - 39363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.