|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21867-21872, July 30, 1999
Chloroethylclonidine and 2-Aminoethyl Methanethiosulfonate
Recognize Two Different Conformations of the Human
2A-Adrenergic Receptor
Anne
Marjamäki ,
Heini
Frang ,
Marjo
Pihlavisto ,
Anna-Marja
Hoffrén¶,
Tiina
Salminen ,
Mark S.
Johnson ,
Jaana
Kallio ,
Jonathan A.
Javitch**, and
Mika
Scheinin
From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical
Pharmacology, University of Turku, MediCity, ¶ Juvantia Pharma
Ltd, and Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacy, Åbo Akademi
University and Turku Center for Biotechnology, University of Turku
and Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6 A, FIN-20520
Turku, Finland and ** Center for Molecular Recognition and the
Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Columbia University College
of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032
The substituted cysteine-accessibility
method and two sulfhydryl-specific reagents, the methane-thiosulfonate
derivative 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA) and the
2-adrenergic receptor ( 2-AR) agonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC), were used to determine the relative
accessibility of engineered cysteines in the fifth transmembrane domain
of the human 2A-AR (H 2A). The second-order rate
constants for the reaction of the receptor with MTSEA and CEC were
determined with the wild type H 2A (cysteine at position 201) and
receptor mutants containing accessible cysteines at other positions
within the binding-site crevice (positions 197, 200, and 204). The rate of reaction of CEC was similar to that of MTSEA at residues Cys-197, Cys-201, and Cys-204. The rate of reaction of CEC with Cys-200, however, was more than 5 times that of MTSEA, suggesting that these
compounds may interact with two different receptor conformations. MTSEA, having no recognition specificity for the receptor,
likely reacts with the predominant inactive receptor conformation (R), whereas the agonist CEC may stabilize and react preferentially with the
active receptor conformation (R*). This hypothesis was consistent with
three-dimensional receptor-ligand models, which further suggest that
2A-AR activation may involve the clockwise rotation of
transmembrane domain 5.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zurn, U. Zabel, J.-P. Vilardaga, H. Schindelin, M. J. Lohse, and C. Hoffmann
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis of {alpha}2a-Adrenergic Receptor Activation Reveals Distinct Agonist-Specific Conformational Changes
Mol. Pharmacol.,
March 1, 2009;
75(3):
534 - 541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Liapakis, W. C. Chan, M. Papadokostaki, and J. A. Javitch
Synergistic Contributions of the Functional Groups of Epinephrine to Its Affinity and Efficacy at the {beta}2 Adrenergic Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol.,
May 1, 2004;
65(5):
1181 - 1190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Pauwels, I. Rauly, and T. Wurch
Dissimilar Pharmacological Responses by a New Series of Imidazoline Derivatives at Precoupled and Ligand-Activated {alpha}2A-Adrenoceptor States: Evidence for Effector Pathway-Dependent Differential Antagonism
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2003;
305(3):
1015 - 1023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Govaerts, A. Bondue, J.-Y. Springael, M. Olivella, X. Deupi, E. Le Poul, S. J. Wodak, M. Parmentier, L. Pardo, and C. Blanpain
Activation of CCR5 by Chemokines Involves an Aromatic Cluster between Transmembrane Helices 2 and 3
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1892 - 1903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nyrönen, M. Pihlavisto, J. M. Peltonen, A.-M. Hoffrén, M. Varis, T. Salminen, S. Wurster, A. Marjamäki, L. Kanerva, E. Katainen, et al.
Molecular Mechanism for Agonist-Promoted alpha 2A-Adrenoceptor Activation by Norepinephrine and Epinephrine
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 16, 2001;
59(5):
1343 - 1354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Shapiro, K. Kristiansen, W. K. Kroeze, and B. L. Roth
Differential Modes of Agonist Binding to 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Serotonin Receptors Revealed by Mutation and Molecular Modeling of Conserved Residues in Transmembrane Region 5
Mol. Pharmacol.,
November 1, 2000;
58(5):
877 - 886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Topham, L. Mouledous, and J.-C. Meunier
On the spatial disposition of the fifth transmembrane helix and the structural integrity of the transmembrane binding site in the opioid and ORL1 G protein-coupled receptor family
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
July 1, 2000;
13(7):
477 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Allman, K. M. Page, C. A.M. Curtis, and E. C. Hulme
Scanning Mutagenesis Identifies Amino Acid Side Chains in Transmembrane Domain 5 of the M1 Muscarinic Receptor that Participate in Binding the Acetyl Methyl Group of Acetylcholine
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2000;
58(1):
175 - 184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Salminen, M. Varis, T. Nyronen, M. Pihlavisto, A.-M. Hoffren, T. Lonnberg, A. Marjamaki, H. Frang, J.-M. Savola, M. Scheinin, et al.
Three-dimensional Models of alpha 2A-Adrenergic Receptor Complexes Provide a Structural Explanation for Ligand Binding
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 13, 1999;
274(33):
23405 - 23413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Frang, V. Cockcroft, T. Karskela, M. Scheinin, and A. Marjamaki
Phenoxybenzamine Binding Reveals the Helical Orientation of the Third Transmembrane Domain of Adrenergic Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 10, 2001;
276(33):
31279 - 31284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|