JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Ruiz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Berzal-Herranz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Ruiz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Berzal-Herranz, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29376-29380, October 8, 1999

Specificity of the Hairpin Ribozyme
SEQUENCE REQUIREMENTS SURROUNDING THE CLEAVAGE SITE

Mercedes Pérez-Ruiz, Alicia Barroso-delJesus, and Alfredo Berzal-Herranz

From the Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina "López-Neyra," Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ventanilla 11, 18001 Granada, Spain

Substrate sequence requirements of the hairpin ribozyme have been partially defined by both mutational and in vitro selection experiments. It was considered that the best targets were those that included the Ndown-arrow GUC sequence surrounding the cleavage site. In contrast to previous studies that failed to evaluate all possible combinations of these nucleotides, we have performed an exhaustive analysis of the cleavage of 64 substrate variants. They represent all possible sequence combinations of the J2/1 nucleotides except the well established G+1. No cleavage was observed with 24 sequences. C+2 variants showed little or no cleavage, whereas U+2 substrates were all cleavable. The maximal cleavage rate was obtained with the AGUC substrate. Cleavage rates of sequences HGUC (H = A, C, or U), GGUN, GGGR (R = A or G), AGUU, and UGUA were up to 5 times lower than the AGUC one. This shows that other sequences besides NGUC could also be considered as good targets. A second group of sequences WGGG (W = A or U), UGUK (K = G or U), MGAG (M = A or C), AGUA, and UGGA were cleaved between 6 and 10 times less efficiently. Furthermore, the UGCU sequence of a noncleavable viral target was mutated to AGUC resulting in a proficiently cleavable substrate by its cognate hairpin ribozyme. This indicates that our conclusions may be extrapolated to other hairpin ribozymes with different specificity.


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RNAHome page
A. T. Torelli, J. Krucinska, and J. E. Wedekind
A comparison of vanadate to a 2'-5' linkage at the active site of a small ribozyme suggests a role for water in transition-state stabilization
RNA, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 1052 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
K.-Y. Jen and A. M. Gewirtz
Suppression of Gene Expression by Targeted Disruption of Messenger RNA: Available Options and Current Strategies
Stem Cells, September 1, 2000; 18(5): 307 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.