![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23387-23397, July 28, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
, and
**
From the Fibroblast growth factor
(FGF)-4 gene expression in the inner cell mass of the
blastocyst and in EC cells requires the combined activity of two
transcriptional regulators, Sox2 and Oct-3, which bind to adjacent
sites on the FGF-4 enhancer DNA and synergistically activate transcription. Sox2 and Oct-3 bind cooperatively to the enhancer DNA through their DNA-binding, high mobility group and POU
domains, respectively. These two domains, however, are not sufficient
to activate transcription. We have analyzed a number of Sox2 and Oct-3
deletion mutants to identify the domains within each protein that
contribute to the activity of the Sox2·Oct-3 complex. Within Oct-3,
we have identified two activation domains, the N-terminal AD1 and the
C-terminal AD2, that play a role in the activity of the Sox2·Oct-3
complex. AD1 also displays transcriptional activation functions in the
absence of Sox2 while AD2 function was only detected within the
Sox2·Oct-3 complex. In Sox2, we have identified three activation
domains within its C terminus: R1, R2, and R3. R1 and R2 can potentiate
weak activation by Sox2 in the absence of Oct-3 but their deletion has
no effect on the Sox2·Oct-3 complex. In contrast, R3 function is only
observed when Sox2 is complexed with Oct-3. In addition, analysis of
Oct-1/Oct-3 chimeras indicates that the Oct-3 homeodomain also plays a
critical role in the formation of a functional Sox2·Oct-3 complex.
Our results are consistent with a model in which the synergistic action
of Sox2 and Oct-3 results from two major processes. Cooperative binding of the factors to the enhancer DNA, mediated by their binding domains,
stably tethers each factor to DNA and increases the activity of
intrinsic activation domains within each protein. Protein-protein and
protein-DNA interactions then may lead to reciprocal conformational changes that expose latent activation domains within each protein. These findings define a mechanism that may also be utilized by other Sox·POU protein complexes in gene activation.
Department of Microbiology, New York
University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016 and the
¶ Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, New
Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania,
Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 212-263-0525;
Fax: 212-263-8714; E-mail: dailel01@med.nyu.edu.
**
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 212-263-5341; Fax:
212-263-8714; E-mail: basilc01@med.nyu.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S J Kimber, S F Sneddon, D J Bloor, A M El-Bareg, J A Hawkhead, A D Metcalfe, F D Houghton, H J Leese, A Rutherford, B A Lieberman, et al. Expression of genes involved in early cell fate decisions in human embryos and their regulation by growth factors Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 635 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Estes, E. Fulkerson, and Y. Zhang Identification of Motifs That Are Conserved in 12 Drosophila Species and Regulate Midline Glia vs. Neuron Expression Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 787 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Boer, J. Kopp, S. Mallanna, M. Desler, H. Chakravarthy, P. J. Wilder, C. Bernadt, and A. Rizzino Elevating the levels of Sox2 in embryonal carcinoma cells and embryonic stem cells inhibits the expression of Sox2:Oct-3/4 target genes Nucleic Acids Res., March 27, 2007; (2007) gkm059v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Chew, Y.-H. Loh, W. Zhang, X. Chen, W.-L. Tam, L.-S. Yeap, P. Li, Y.-S. Ang, B. Lim, P. Robson, et al. Reciprocal Transcriptional Regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 Complex in Embryonic Stem Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2005; 25(14): 6031 - 6046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mansukhani, D. Ambrosetti, G. Holmes, L. Cornivelli, and C. Basilico Sox2 induction by FGF and FGFR2 activating mutations inhibits Wnt signaling and osteoblast differentiation J. Cell Biol., March 28, 2005; 168(7): 1065 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Okumura-Nakanishi, M. Saito, H. Niwa, and F. Ishikawa Oct-3/4 and Sox2 Regulate Oct-3/4 Gene in Embryonic Stem Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5307 - 5317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rajaram and T. K. Kerppola Synergistic Transcription Activation by Maf and Sox and Their Subnuclear Localization Are Disrupted by a Mutation in Maf That Causes Cataract Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5694 - 5709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Williams Jr., M. Cai, and G. M. Clore Molecular Basis for Synergistic Transcriptional Activation by Oct1 and Sox2 Revealed from the Solution Structure of the 42-kDa Oct1{middle dot}Sox2{middle dot}Hoxb1-DNA Ternary Transcription Factor Complex J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1449 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Remenyi, K. Lins, L. J. Nissen, R. Reinbold, H. R. Scholer, and M. Wilmanns Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers Genes & Dev., August 15, 2003; 17(16): 2048 - 2059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Wiebe, T. K. Nowling, and A. Rizzino Identification of Novel Domains within Sox-2 and Sox-11 Involved in Autoinhibition of DNA Binding and Partnership Specificity J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17901 - 17911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Avilion, S. K. Nicolis, L. H. Pevny, L. Perez, N. Vivian, and R. Lovell-Badge Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function Genes & Dev., January 1, 2003; 17(1): 126 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tomioka, M. Nishimoto, S. Miyagi, T. Katayanagi, N. Fukui, H. Niwa, M. Muramatsu, and A. Okuda Identification of Sox-2 regulatory region which is under the control of Oct-3/4-Sox-2 complex Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2002; 30(14): 3202 - 3213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Terraz, G. Brideau, P. Ronco, and J. Rossert A Combination of cis-Acting Elements Is Required to Activate the Pro-alpha 1(I) Collagen Promoter in Tendon Fibroblasts of Transgenic Mice J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 19019 - 19026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Niwa, S. Masui, I. Chambers, A. G. Smith, and J.-i. Miyazaki Phenotypic Complementation Establishes Requirements for Specific POU Domain and Generic Transactivation Function of Oct-3/4 in Embryonic Stem Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2002; 22(5): 1526 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pesce and H. R. Scholer Oct-4: Gatekeeper in the Beginnings of Mammalian Development Stem Cells, July 1, 2001; 19(4): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kamachi, M. Uchikawa, A. Tanouchi, R. Sekido, and H. Kondoh Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development Genes & Dev., May 15, 2001; 15(10): 1272 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Weiss Floppy SOX: Mutual Induced Fit in HMG (High-Mobility Group) Box-DNA Recognition Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2001; 15(3): 353 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |