![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 37552-37558, December 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Metabolic Research Unit, University of California, San
Francisco and the § Departments of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143-0540
Antiestrogens, including tamoxifen and
raloxifene, block estrogen receptor (ER) action by blocking the
interactions of an estrogen-dependent activation function
(AF-2) with p160 coactivators. Although tamoxifen does show some
agonist activity in the presence of ER
An Antiestrogen-responsive Estrogen Receptor-
Mutant (D351Y)
Shows Weak AF-2 Activity in the Presence of Tamoxifen*
,
, this stems from a distinct
constitutive activation function (AF-1) that lies within the ER
N
terminus. Previous studies identified a naturally occurring mutation
(D351Y) that allows ER
to perceive tamoxifen and raloxifene as
estrogens. Here, we examine the contributions of ER
activation
functions to the D351Y phenotype. We find that the AF-2 function of
ER
D351Y lacks detectable tamoxifen-dependent activity
when tested in isolation but does synergize with AF-1 to allow enhanced
tamoxifen response. Weak tamoxifen-dependent interactions
between the ER
D351Y AF-2 function and GRIP1, a representative p160,
can be detected in glutathione S-transferase binding assays
and mammalian two-hybrid assays. Furthermore,
tamoxifen-dependent AF-2 activity can be detected in the
presence of ER
D351Y and high levels of overexpressed GRIP1. We
therefore propose that the D351Y mutation allows weak
tamoxifen-dependent AF-2 activity but that this activity is
only detectable when AF-1 is strong, and AF-1 and AF-2 synergize, or
when p160s are overexpressed. We discuss the possible structural basis
of this effect.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants DK51083 (to P. J. K.) and Grant DK57574 (to
T. S. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-476-6789;
Fax: 415-476-1660; E-mail: webbp@itsa.ucsf.edu.
¶
Supported by a fellowship from the American Cancer Society of California.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Georget, W. Bourguet, S. Lumbroso, S. Makni, C. Sultan, and J.-C. Nicolas Glutamic Acid 709 Substitutions Highlight the Importance of the Interaction between Androgen Receptor Helices H3 and H12 for Androgen and Antiandrogen Actions Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 20(4): 724 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kim, M. H. Lee, B. J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. J. Han, H. Y. Kim, and M. R Stallcup Role of aspartate 351 in transactivation and active conformation of estrogen receptor {alpha} J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 35(3): 449 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Herynk and S. A. W. Fuqua Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 869 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frasor, F. Stossi, J. M. Danes, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Discrimination of Agonistic versus Antagonistic Activities by Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1522 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Webb, P. Nguyen, and P. J. Kushner Differential SERM Effects on Corepressor Binding Dictate ERalpha Activity in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 6912 - 6920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liu, W.-C. Park, D. J. Bentrem, K. P. McKian, A. D. L. Reyes, J. A. Loweth, J. M. Schafer, J. W. Zapf, and V. C. Jordan Structure-Function Relationships of the Raloxifene-Estrogen Receptor-alpha Complex for Regulating Transforming Growth Factor-alpha Expression in Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 9189 - 9198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Baxter, P. Goede, J. W. Apriletti, B. L. West, W. Feng, K. Mellstrom, R. J. Fletterick, R. L. Wagner, P. J. Kushner, R. C. J. Ribeiro, et al. Structure-Based Design and Synthesis of a Thyroid Hormone Receptor (TR) Antagonist Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 517 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamamoto, O. Wada, M. Suzawa, Y. Yogiashi, T. Yano, S. Kato, and J. Yanagisawa The Tamoxifen-responsive Estrogen Receptor alpha Mutant D351Y Shows Reduced Tamoxifen-dependent Interaction with Corepressor Complexes J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 42684 - 42691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Jordan, J. M. Schafer, A. S. Levenson, H. Liu, K. M. Pease, L. A. Simons, and J. W. Zapf Molecular Classification of Estrogens Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(18): 6619 - 6623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |