|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 18, 15059-15065, May 4, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et
Cellulaire, Laboratoire de Biologie et de Génomique
Structurales 1, rue Laurent Fries, BP 163 67404 Illkirch, France
The crystal structure of a triple cysteine to
serine mutant ER The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1QKT) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
Crystal Structure of a Mutant hER
Ligand-binding
Domain Reveals Key Structural Features for the Mechanism of
Partial Agonism*
ligand-binding domain (LBD), complexed with
estradiol, shows that despite the presence of a tightly bound agonist
ligand, the protein exhibits an antagonist-like conformation, similar
to that observed in raloxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen-bound
structures. This mutated receptor binds estradiol with wild type
affinity and displays transcriptional activity upon estradiol
stimulation, but with limited potency (about 50%). This partial
activity is efficiently repressed in antagonist competition assays. The
comparison with available LBD structures reveals key features governing
the positioning of helix H12 and highlights the importance of cysteine residues in promoting an active conformation. Furthermore the present
study reveals a hydrogen bond network connecting ligand binding
to protein trans conformation. These observations support a dynamic
view of H12 positioning, where the control of the equilibrium between
two stable locations determines the partial agonist character of a
given ligand.
*
This work was supported by funds from Schering AG and CNRS
and by grants from the Ministère de la Recherche et de
l'Enseignement Supérieur and the Association pour la Recherche
sur le Cancer.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-388-65-3351;
Fax: 33-388-65-3276; E-mail: moras@igbmc.u-strasbg.fr.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J Kojetin, T. P Burris, E. V Jensen, and S. A Khan Implications of the binding of tamoxifen to the coactivator recognition site of the estrogen receptor Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 851 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Soisson, G. Parthasarathy, A. D. Adams, S. Sahoo, A. Sitlani, C. Sparrow, J. Cui, and J. W. Becker Identification of a potent synthetic FXR agonist with an unexpected mode of binding and activation PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5337 - 5342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Heldring, A. Pike, S. Andersson, J. Matthews, G. Cheng, J. Hartman, M. Tujague, A. Strom, E. Treuter, M. Warner, et al. Estrogen Receptors: How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 905 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pochetti, C. Godio, N. Mitro, D. Caruso, A. Galmozzi, S. Scurati, F. Loiodice, G. Fracchiolla, P. Tortorella, A. Laghezza, et al. Insights into the Mechanism of Partial Agonism: CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF THE PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR {gamma} LIGAND-BINDING DOMAIN IN THE COMPLEX WITH TWO ENANTIOMERIC LIGANDS J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2007; 282(23): 17314 - 17324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bovet, A. Wortmann, S. Eiler, F. Granger, M. Ruff, B. Gerrits, D. Moras, and R. Zenobi Estrogen receptor-ligand complexes measured by chip-based nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry: An approach for the screening of endocrine disruptors Protein Sci., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 938 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lupien, M. Jeyakumar, E. Hebert, K. Hilmi, D. Cotnoir-White, C. Loch, A. Auger, G. Dayan, G.-A. Pinard, J.-M. Wurtz, et al. Raloxifene and ICI182,780 Increase Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Association with a Nuclear Compartment via Overlapping Sets of Hydrophobic Amino Acids in Activation Function 2 Helix 12 Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 21(4): 797 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yan, Y.-S. Kim, X.-P. Yang, M. Albers, M. Koegl, and A. M. Jetten Ubiquitin-interaction motifs of RAP80 are critical in its regulation of estrogen receptor {alpha} Nucleic Acids Res., March 12, 2007; 35(5): 1673 - 1686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, N. Y. Chirgadze, S. L. Briggs, S. Khan, E. V. Jensen, and T. P. Burris A second binding site for hydroxytamoxifen within the coactivator-binding groove of estrogen receptor beta PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 9908 - 9911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Carlsson, K. F. Koehler, and L. Nilsson Glucocorticoid Receptor Point Mutation V571M Facilitates Coactivator and Ligand Binding by Structural Rearrangement and Stabilization Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 1960 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Koehler, L. A. Helguero, L.-A. Haldosen, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Reflections on the Discovery and Significance of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2005; 26(3): 465 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suetsugi, L. Su, K. Karlsberg, Y.-C. Yuan, and S. Chen Flavone and Isoflavone Phytoestrogens Are Agonists of Estrogen-Related Receptors Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 1(13): 981 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhao, A. Koide, J. Abrams, S. Deighton-Collins, A. Martinez, J. A. Schwartz, S. Koide, and D. F. Skafar Mutation of Leu-536 in Human Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Alters the Coupling between Ligand Binding, Transcription Activation, and Receptor Conformation J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 27278 - 27286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Farboud, H. Hauksdottir, Y. Wu, and M. L. Privalsky Isotype-Restricted Corepressor Recruitment: a Constitutively Closed Helix 12 Conformation in Retinoic Acid Receptors {beta} and {gamma} Interferes with Corepressor Recruitment and Prevents Transcriptional Repression Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 2844 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tamrazi, K. E. Carlson, J. R. Daniels, K. M. Hurth, and J. A Katzenellenbogen Estrogen Receptor Dimerization: Ligand Binding Regulates Dimer Affinity and DimerDissociation Rate Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2002; 16(12): 2706 - 2719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Yudt and J. A. Cidlowski The Glucocorticoid Receptor: Coding a Diversity of Proteins and Responses through a Single Gene Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2002; 16(8): 1719 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Rich, L. R. Hoth, K. F. Geoghegan, T. A. Brown, P. K. LeMotte, S. P. Simons, P. Hensley, and D. G. Myszka Kinetic analysis of estrogen receptor/ligand interactions PNAS, June 25, 2002; 99(13): 8562 - 8567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |