![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 40, 37390-37401, October 5, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From The p53 protein is the major tumor suppressor in
mammals. The discovery of the p53 homologs p63 and p73 defined a family
of p53 members with distinct roles in tumor suppression,
differentiation, and development. Here, we describe the biochemical
characterization of the core DNA-binding domain of a human isoform of
p63, p63- The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ315499.
High Thermostability and Lack of Cooperative DNA Binding
Distinguish the p63 Core Domain from the Homologous Tumor Suppressor
p53*
§¶,
,
,
§, and
Pharma Research, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D-82372
Penzberg, Germany and the § Abteilung für
Strukturforschung, Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie,
D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
, and particularly novel features in comparison with p53.
In contrast to p53, the free p63 core domain did not show specific
binding to p53 DNA consensus sites. However, glutathione
S-transferase-fused and thus dimerized p63 and p53 core
domains had similar affinity and specificity for the p53 consensus
sites p21, gadd45, cyclin G, and
bax. Furthermore, the fold of p63 core was remarkably
stable compared with p53 as judged by differential scanning calorimetry (Tm = 61 °C versus 44 °C for p53)
and equilibrium unfolding ([urea]50% = 5.2 M
versus 3.1 M for p53). A homology model of p63
core highlights differences at a segment near the H1 helix hypothetically involved in the formation of the dimerization interface in p53, which might reduce cooperativity of p63 core DNA binding compared with p53. The model also shows differences in the
electrostatic and hydrophobic potentials of the domains relevant to
folding stability.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Pan and R. Nussinov Structural Basis for p53 Binding-induced DNA Bending J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2007; 282(1): 691 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Ho, M. X. Fitzgerald, and R. Marmorstein Structure of the p53 Core Domain Dimer Bound to DNA J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 20494 - 20502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tomita, N. Marchenko, S. Erster, A. Nemajerova, A. Dehner, C. Klein, H. Pan, H. Kessler, P. Pancoska, and U. M. Moll WT p53, but Not Tumor-derived Mutants, Bind to Bcl2 via the DNA Binding Domain and Induce Mitochondrial Permeabilization J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8600 - 8606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Osada, H. L. Park, Y. Nagakawa, K. Yamashita, A. Fomenkov, M. S. Kim, G. Wu, S. Nomoto, B. Trink, and D. Sidransky Differential Recognition of Response Elements Determines Target Gene Specificity for p53 and p63 Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2005; 25(14): 6077 - 6089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Demma, S. Wong, E. Maxwell, and B. Dasmahapatra CP-31398 Restores DNA-binding Activity to Mutant p53 in Vitro but Does Not Affect p53 Homologs p63 and p73 J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45887 - 45896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mozo-Villarias, J. Cedano, and E. Querol A simple electrostatic criterion for predicting the thermal stability of proteins Protein Eng. Des. Sel., April 1, 2003; 16(4): 279 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Klein, E. Planker, T. Diercks, H. Kessler, K.-P. Kunkele, K. Lang, S. Hansen, and M. Schwaiger NMR Spectroscopy Reveals the Solution Dimerization Interface of p53 Core Domains Bound to Their Consensus DNA J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 49020 - 49027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |