![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 45, 41938-41944, November 9, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queen's
Medical Center, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
The replicative apparatus often encounters blocks
to its progression that necessitate removal of the block and reloading
of the replication machinery. In Escherichia coli, a major
pathway of replication restart involves unwinding of the stalled fork to generate a four-stranded Holliday junction, which can then be
cleaved by the RuvABC helicase-endonuclease. This fork regression may
be catalyzed by RecG but is thought to occur even in its absence. Here
we test whether RuvAB helicase can also catalyze the unwinding of
forked DNA to form Holliday junctions. We find that fork DNA is unwound
in the direction required for Holliday junction formation only if the
loading of RuvB is restricted to the parental duplex DNA arm. If the
binding of RuvB is unrestricted, then RuvAB preferentially unwinds
forks in the opposite direction. This is probably related to the
greater efficiency of two opposed RuvB hexamers operating across a
junction compared with a single hexamer. These data argue against RuvAB
acting directly at damaged replication forks and imply that other
mechanisms must operate in vivo to catalyze Holliday junction formation.
Action of RuvAB at Replication Fork Structures*
and
*
This work was supported by a program grant from the Medical
Research Council (to R. G. L. and Gary Sharples).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of the Lister Institute-Jenner Research Fellowship.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-115-9709406;
Fax: 44-115-9709906; E-mail: bob.lloyd@nottingham.ac.uk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. T. Long and K. N. Kreuzer Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4 PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6852 - 6857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Donaldson, C. T. Courcelle, and J. Courcelle RuvABC Is Required to Resolve Holliday Junctions That Accumulate following Replication on Damaged Templates in Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28811 - 28821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Karymov, D. Daniel, O. F. Sankey, and Y. L. Lyubchenko Holliday junction dynamics and branch migration: Single-molecule analysis PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8186 - 8191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. V. Privezentzev, A. Keeley, B. Sigala, and I. R. Tsaneva The Role of RuvA Octamerization for RuvAB Function in Vitro and in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3365 - 3375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. O'Reilly and K. N. Kreuzer Isolation of SOS Constitutive Mutants of Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2004; 186(21): 7149 - 7160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Donaldson, C. T. Courcelle, and J. Courcelle RuvAB and RecG Are Not Essential for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis Following UV-Induced DNA Damage in Escherichia coli Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1631 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Robu, R. B. Inman, and M. M. Cox Situational Repair of Replication Forks: ROLES OF RecG AND RecA PROTEINS J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 10973 - 10981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Weitao, M. Budd, L. L. M. Hoopes, and J. L. Campbell Dna2 Helicase/Nuclease Causes Replicative Fork Stalling and Double-strand Breaks in the Ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22513 - 22522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |