|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106693200 on September 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 44541-44550, November 30, 2001
A Comparison of the GroE Chaperonin Requirements for Sequentially
and Structurally Homologous Malate Dehydrogenases
THE IMPORTANCE OF FOLDING KINETICS AND SOLUTION ENVIRONMENT*
Bryan C.
Tieman ,
Mary F.
Johnston, and
Mark T.
Fisher§
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Kansas Medical Center,
Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7421
Escherichia coli malate
dehydrogenase (EcMDH) and its eukaryotic counterpart, porcine
mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (PmMDH), are highly homologous
proteins with significant sequence identity (60%) and virtually
identical native structural folds. Despite this homology, EcMDH folds
rapidly and efficiently in vitro and does not seem to
interact with GroE chaperonins at physiological temperatures
(37 °C), whereas PmMDH folds much slower than EcMDH and requires
these chaperonins to fold to the native state at 37 °C. Double jump
experiments indicate that the slow folding behavior of PmMDH is not
limited by proline isomerization. Although the folding enhancer
glycerol (<5 M) does not alter the renaturation kinetics
of EcMDH, it dramatically accelerates the spontaneous renaturation of PmMDH at all temperatures tested. Kinetic
analysis of PmMDH renaturation with increasing glycerol concentrations suggests that this osmolyte increases the on-pathway kinetics of the
monomer folding to assembly-competent forms. Other osmolytes such
as trimethylamine N-oxide, sucrose, and betaine also
reactivate PmMDH at nonpermissive temperatures (37 °C).
Glycerol jump experiments with preformed GroEL·PmMDH complexes
indicate that the shift between stringent (requires ATP and GroES) and
relaxed (only requires ATP) complex conformations is rapid (<3-5 s).
The similarity in irreversible misfolding kinetics of PmMDH measured
with glycerol or the activated chaperonin complex (GroEL·GroES·ATP)
suggests that these folding aids may influence the same step in the
PmMDH folding reaction. Moreover, the interactions between
glycerol-induced PmMDH folding intermediates and GroEL·GroES·ATP
are diminished. Our results support the notion that the protein folding
kinetics of sequentially and structurally homologous proteins, rather
than the structural fold, dictates the GroE chaperonin requirement.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM49309 (to M. T. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Contributed to more than 90% of the work presented in this paper.
Present address: Abbott Laboratories, ADD Hybridoma Research, 100 Abbott Park, Abbott Park, IL 60064.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7421. Tel.: 913-588-6940; Fax: 913-588-7440; E-mail: mfisher1@kumc.edu.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Stan, B. R. Brooks, G. H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai
Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state
PNAS,
March 21, 2006;
103(12):
4433 - 4438.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mishra, R. Seckler, and R. Bhat
Efficient Refolding of Aggregation-prone Citrate Synthase by Polyol Osmolytes: HOW WELL ARE PROTEIN FOLDING AND STABILITY ASPECTS COUPLED?
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 22, 2005;
280(16):
15553 - 15560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. K. Khor, M. T. Fisher, and C. Schoneich
Potential Role of Methionine Sulfoxide in the Inactivation of the Chaperone GroEL by Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl) and Peroxynitrite (ONOO-)
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 7, 2004;
279(19):
19486 - 19493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|