Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106693200 on September 10, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 44541-44550, November 30, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/48/44541    most recent
M106693200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tieman, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tieman, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Comparison of the GroE Chaperonin Requirements for Sequentially and Structurally Homologous Malate Dehydrogenases
THE IMPORTANCE OF FOLDING KINETICS AND SOLUTION ENVIRONMENT*

Bryan C. TiemanDagger , Mary F. Johnston, and Mark T. Fisher§

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7421

Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase (EcMDH) and its eukaryotic counterpart, porcine mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (PmMDH), are highly homologous proteins with significant sequence identity (60%) and virtually identical native structural folds. Despite this homology, EcMDH folds rapidly and efficiently in vitro and does not seem to interact with GroE chaperonins at physiological temperatures (37 °C), whereas PmMDH folds much slower than EcMDH and requires these chaperonins to fold to the native state at 37 °C. Double jump experiments indicate that the slow folding behavior of PmMDH is not limited by proline isomerization. Although the folding enhancer glycerol (<5 M) does not alter the renaturation kinetics of EcMDH, it dramatically accelerates the spontaneous renaturation of PmMDH at all temperatures tested. Kinetic analysis of PmMDH renaturation with increasing glycerol concentrations suggests that this osmolyte increases the on-pathway kinetics of the monomer folding to assembly-competent forms. Other osmolytes such as trimethylamine N-oxide, sucrose, and betaine also reactivate PmMDH at nonpermissive temperatures (37 °C). Glycerol jump experiments with preformed GroEL·PmMDH complexes indicate that the shift between stringent (requires ATP and GroES) and relaxed (only requires ATP) complex conformations is rapid (<3-5 s). The similarity in irreversible misfolding kinetics of PmMDH measured with glycerol or the activated chaperonin complex (GroEL·GroES·ATP) suggests that these folding aids may influence the same step in the PmMDH folding reaction. Moreover, the interactions between glycerol-induced PmMDH folding intermediates and GroEL·GroES·ATP are diminished. Our results support the notion that the protein folding kinetics of sequentially and structurally homologous proteins, rather than the structural fold, dictates the GroE chaperonin requirement.


* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM49309 (to M. T. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Contributed to more than 90% of the work presented in this paper. Present address: Abbott Laboratories, ADD Hybridoma Research, 100 Abbott Park, Abbott Park, IL 60064.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7421. Tel.: 913-588-6940; Fax: 913-588-7440; E-mail: mfisher1@kumc.edu.


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Stan, B. R. Brooks, G. H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai
Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state
PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4433 - 4438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Mishra, R. Seckler, and R. Bhat
Efficient Refolding of Aggregation-prone Citrate Synthase by Polyol Osmolytes: HOW WELL ARE PROTEIN FOLDING AND STABILITY ASPECTS COUPLED?
J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 15553 - 15560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. K. Khor, M. T. Fisher, and C. Schoneich
Potential Role of Methionine Sulfoxide in the Inactivation of the Chaperone GroEL by Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl) and Peroxynitrite (ONOO-)
J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19486 - 19493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement