![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19600-19608, May 31, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima
University, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
Cadherins are transmembrane glycoproteins involved in
Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Using
L cells coexpressing E-cadherin constructs with different epitope tags,
we examined the lateral dimerization of E-cadherin and its adhesive
activity by co-immunoprecipitation and aggregation assays,
respectively. Although the transmembrane domain is required for
dimerization, tail-less constructs possessing the transmembrane domain
of either N-cadherin or CD45 show dimerization and are active in
aggregation assays. Two mutant constructs having either of two amino
acid substitutions, W2A or substitutions that disrupt the recognition
sequence for endoproteolytic enzymes involved in removal of the
precursor segment, cannot form dimers and are inactive in aggregation.
These monomeric proteins, like their wild-type dimerizing counterparts,
retain their Ca2+-dependent resistance to
trypsin digestion, suggesting that dimerization per se does
not induce a large conformational change. Two other constructs, having
either an amino acid substitution, D134A, or a C-terminal deletion of
70 amino acid residues, retain the ability to associate laterally but
are inactive in aggregation assays. Staurosporine treatment of cells
expressing the latter construct increases aggregation but does
not increase the extent of lateral dimerization. Thus, lateral
dimerization is necessary, but not sufficient for adhesive activity.
Lateral Dimerization of the E-cadherin Extracellular Domain Is
Necessary but Not Sufficient for Adhesive Activity*
*
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for science
research on priority area (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-99-275-5246; Fax: 81-99-264-5618; E-mail:
mozawa@m.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-H. Chien, N. Jiang, F. Li, F. Zhang, C. Zhu, and D. Leckband Two Stage Cadherin Kinetics Require Multiple Extracellular Domains but Not the Cytoplasmic Region J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1848 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyashita and M. Ozawa A dileucine motif in its cytoplasmic domain directs -catenin-uncoupled E-cadherin to the lysosome J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2007; 120(24): 4395 - 4406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Troyanovsky, O. Laur, and S. M. Troyanovsky Stable and Unstable Cadherin Dimers: Mechanisms of Formation and Roles in Cell Adhesion Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2007; 18(11): 4343 - 4352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyashita and M. Ozawa Increased Internalization of p120-uncoupled E-cadherin and a Requirement for a Dileucine Motif in the Cytoplasmic Domain for Endocytosis of the Protein J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 11540 - 11548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Troyanovsky, E. P. Sokolov, and S. M. Troyanovsky Endocytosis of Cadherin from Intracellular Junctions Is the Driving Force for Cadherin Adhesive Dimer Disassembly Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3484 - 3493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kobayashi, A. Ikesue, S. Majumdar, and T. J. Siahaan Inhibition of E-Cadherin-Mediated Homotypic Adhesion of Caco-2 Cells: A Novel Evaluation Assay for Peptide Activities in Modulating Cell-Cell Adhesion J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kimura, T. Usui, A. Tsubouchi, and T. Uemura Potential dual molecular interaction of the Drosophila 7-pass transmembrane cadherin Flamingo in dendritic morphogenesis J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2006; 119(6): 1118 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Panorchan, M. S. Thompson, K. J. Davis, Y. Tseng, K. Konstantopoulos, and D. Wirtz Single-molecule analysis of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2006; 119(1): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shiraishi, K. Tsuzaka, K. Yoshimoto, C. Kumazawa, K. Nozaki, T. Abe, K. Tsubota, and T. Takeuchi Critical Role of the Fifth Domain of E-Cadherin for Heterophilic Adhesion with {alpha}E{beta}7, But Not for Homophilic Adhesion J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 1014 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Chen, S. Posy, A. Ben-Shaul, L. Shapiro, and B. H. Honig Specificity of cell-cell adhesion by classical cadherins: Critical role for low-affinity dimerization through {beta}-strand swapping PNAS, June 14, 2005; 102(24): 8531 - 8536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamasaki, T. Sekimoto, T. Ohkubo, T. Douchi, Y. Nagata, M. Ozawa, and Y. Yoneda Zinc finger domain of Snail functions as a nuclear localization signal for importin {beta}-mediated nuclear import pathway Genes Cells, May 1, 2005; 10(5): 455 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Harrison, E. M. Corps, T. Berge, and P. J. Kilshaw The mechanism of cell adhesion by classical cadherins: the role of domain 1 J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2005; 118(4): 711 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Chu, W. A. Thomas, O. Eder, F. Pincet, E. Perez, J. P. Thiery, and S. Dufour Force measurements in E-cadherin-mediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42 J. Cell Biol., December 20, 2004; 167(6): 1183 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohkubo and M. Ozawa The transcription factor Snail downregulates the tight junction components independently of E-cadherin downregulation J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(9): 1675 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Troyanovsky, E. Sokolov, and S. M. Troyanovsky Adhesive and Lateral E-Cadherin Dimers Are Mediated by the Same Interface Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 7965 - 7972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ozawa p120-independent Modulation of E-cadherin Adhesion Activity by the Membrane-proximal Region of the Cytoplasmic Domain J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 46014 - 46020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fournes, J. Farrah, M. Olson, N. Lamarche-Vane, and N. Beauchemin Distinct Rho GTPase Activities Regulate Epithelial Cell Localization of the Adhesion Molecule CEACAM1: Involvement of the CEACAM1 Transmembrane Domain Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2003; 23(20): 7291 - 7304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Wahl III, Y. J. Kim, J. M. Cullen, K. R. Johnson, and M. J. Wheelock N-cadherin-Catenin Complexes Form Prior to Cleavage of the Proregion and Transport to the Plasma Membrane J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 17269 - 17276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |