|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112381200 on May 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 28, 25344-25355, July 12, 2002
Cooperation of Protein Kinase A and Ras/ERK Signaling Pathways Is
Required for AP-1-mediated Activation of Fibroblast Growth
Factor-inducible Response Element (FiRE)*
Juha-Pekka
Pursiheimo §,
Jussi
Saari ,
Markku
Jalkanen¶, and
Markku
Salmivirta¶
From the Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University
of Turku and the Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6B,
Biocity and the ¶ BioTie Therapies Corporation, Tykistökatu
6, 20520 Turku, Finland
Recent studies suggest a crucial role for protein
kinase A (PKA) in the regulation of growth factor signaling. However,
the effect of PKA on the transcription of growth factor-responsive genes has drawn far less attention. Here we have investigated the
signaling mechanisms involved in the activation of an activator protein-1 (AP-1)-driven, growth factor-specific enhancer element, fibroblast growth factor-inducible response element (FiRE). The activation was found to be mediated by three phorbol
12-O-tetradecanoate-13-acetate-response element-related DNA
elements of FiRE, including motif 4 and two distinct elements of motif
5 (referred to as M5-1 and M5-2). All three elements were required for
full FiRE activity. Stimulation of cells with fibroblast growth
factor-2 (FGF-2) induced the binding of AP-1 to motif 4 and M5-2,
whereas M5-1 did not show detectable binding. The FGF-2-induced FiRE
activation appeared to require cooperational function of the Ras/ERK
and PKA pathways. Inhibition of either of the pathways abolished the
binding of AP-1 complexes to motif 4 and motif 5 and the subsequent
FiRE activation. By contrast, costimulation of cells with FGF-2 and the
PKA activator 8-bromo-cyclic AMP increased the binding of AP-1 to FiRE
and potentiated the level of transcriptional activity. The
cooperational function of these two pathways was confirmed by
experiments with cell lines stably expressing
4-hydroxytamoxifen-inducible oncogenic Raf-1 ( Raf-1:ER[DD]). Noticeably, the induction systems showed
variations with respect to regulation of AP-1-driven activation of
FiRE. These differences were likely to originate from the ability of these two systems to induce the differential activation pattern of the
Ras/ERK pathway.
*
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the
Finnish Cancer Union, the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Turku
University Foundation, and Emil Aaltonen Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Oy Juvantia Pharma Ltd., Lemminkäisenkatu 5, Pharmacity, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. To whom correspondence should be
addressed. Tel.: 358-2-6517-1511; Fax: 358-2-6517-1599; E-mail: juha-pekka.pursiheimo@juvantia.com.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, K. McKeehan, Y. Lin, J. Zhang, and F. Wang
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1) Tyrosine Phosphorylation Regulates Binding of FGFR Substrate 2{alpha} (FRS2{alpha}) But Not FRS2 to the Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2008;
22(1):
167 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|