![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 3, 2287-2301, January 18, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Macrophage tropic (M-tropic) human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of primary human T cells and
macrophages requires optimal cell surface expression of the chemokine
receptor CCR5 in addition to CD4. Natural mutations of CCR5 that impair
surface expression bestow in the homozygous state complete resistance to M-tropic HIV infection. ccr5
Reduced Cell Surface Expression of CCR5 in CCR5
32
Heterozygotes Is Mediated by Gene Dosage, Rather Than by Receptor
Sequestration*
§,
,
,
, and
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and
** Laboratory of Host Defenses, NIAID, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, ¶ Istituto di Patologia
Generale, Via Mangiagalli, Milano, 20133 Italy, and the
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
32 is the major prototype
of such mutants. ccr5
32 heterozygosity is associated
with delayed onset of AIDS and reduced risk of initial transmission,
and this correlates with reduced levels of CCR5 and reduced
infectability of CD4+ cells. In addition to gene dosage, sequestration
of wild type (WT) CCR5 by mutant protein has been proposed as a
mechanism to explain reduced surface expression of CCR5 in cells from
ccr5
32 and CCR5-893(
)
heterozygotes. However, here we demonstrate that a molar excess of
ccr5
32 or related deletion mutants does not significantly impair the cell surface density of co-expressed WT
receptor either in human epithelial cells or Jurkat T cells. Further,
ligand-dependent signaling and M-tropic HIV usage of WT
receptor are also unaffected. Nascent WT receptor does associate with
ccr5
32 and related mutant proteins and with other
unrelated CC and CXC chemokine receptors under transient labeling
conditions. However, using confocal microscopy, we demonstrate that in
the steady state, WT and truncated CCR5 proteins segregate into
nonoverlapping subcellular compartments. These findings together with
the observed and known variability in the cell surface density of CCR5
on quiescent PBLs lead us to conclude that reduced CCR5 gene dosage
rather than receptor sequestration is the major determinant of reduced CCR5 expression in cells from ccr5
32 heterozygotes.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Szidonya, M. Cserzo, and L. Hunyady Dimerization and oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: debated structures with established and emerging functions J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 196(3): 435 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pilotti, L. Elviri, E. Vicenzi, U. Bertazzoni, M. C. Re, S. Allibardi, G. Poli, and C. Casoli Postgenomic up-regulation of CCL3L1 expression in HTLV-2-infected persons curtails HIV-1 replication Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 1850 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Soares, R. Foxall, A. Albuquerque, C. Cortesao, M. Garcia, R. M. M. Victorino, and A. E. Sousa Increased Frequency of Circulating CCR5+ CD4+ T Cells in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Infection J. Virol., December 15, 2006; 80(24): 12425 - 12429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dong and G. Wu Regulation of Anterograde Transport of {alpha}2-Adrenergic Receptors by the N Termini at Multiple Intracellular Compartments J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38543 - 38554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hladik, H. Liu, E. Speelmon, D. Livingston-Rosanoff, S. Wilson, P. Sakchalathorn, Y. Hwangbo, B. Greene, T. Zhu, and M. J. McElrath Combined Effect of CCR5-{Delta}32 Heterozygosity and the CCR5 Promoter Polymorphism -2459 A/G on CCR5 Expression and Resistance to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transmission J. Virol., September 15, 2005; 79(18): 11677 - 11684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Rose, J. F. Foley, P. M. Murphy, and S. Venkatesan On the Mechanism and Significance of Ligand-induced Internalization of Human Neutrophil Chemokine Receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24372 - 24386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Agrawal, X. Lu, J. Qingwen, Z. VanHorn-Ali, I. V. Nicolescu, D. H. McDermott, P. M. Murphy, and G. Alkhatib Role for CCR5{Delta}32 Protein in Resistance to R5, R5X4, and X4 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Primary CD4+ Cells J. Virol., March 1, 2004; 78(5): 2277 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Venkatesan, J. J. Rose, R. Lodge, P. M. Murphy, and J. F. Foley Distinct Mechanisms of Agonist-induced Endocytosis for Human Chemokine Receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2003; 14(8): 3305 - 3324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chelli and M. Alizon Rescue of HIV-1 Receptor Function through Cooperation between Different Forms of the CCR5 Chemokine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39388 - 39396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Z. Fernandis, R. P. Cherla, R. D. Chernock, and R. K. Ganju CXCR4/CCR5 Down-modulation and Chemotaxis Are Regulated by the Proteasome Pathway J. Biol. Chem., May 10, 2002; 277(20): 18111 - 18117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |