Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M305493200 on June 3, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 35, 32526-32536, August 29, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/35/32526    most recent
M305493200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Relationship between Side Reactions and Slow Inhibition of Ribulose-bisphosphate Carboxylase Revealed by a Loop 6 Mutant of the Tobacco Enzyme*

F. Grant Pearce and T. John Andrews {ddagger}

From the Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, P. O. Box 475, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia

The first directed mutant of a higher plant ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), constructed by chloroplast transformation, is catalytically impaired but still able to support the plant's photosynthesis and growth (Whitney, S. M., von Caemmerer, S., Hudson, G. S., and Andrews, T. J. (1999) Plant Physiol. 121, 579–588). This mutant enzyme has a Leu to Val substitution at residue 335 in the flexible loop 6 of the large subunit, which closes over the substrate during catalysis. Its active site was intact, as judged by its barely impaired competency in the initial enolization step of the reaction sequence, and its ability to bind tightly the intermediate analog, 2'-carboxy-D-arabinitol-1,5-bisphosphate. Prompted by observations that the mutant enzyme displayed much less slow inhibition during catalysis in vitro than the wild type, its tendency to catalyze side reactions and its response to the slow inhibitor D-xylulose-1,5-bisphosphate were studied. The lessening in slow inhibition was not caused by reduced production of inhibitory side products. Except for pyruvate production, these reactions were strongly enhanced by the mutation, as was the ability to catalyze the carboxylation of D-xylulose-1,5-bisphosphate. Rather, reduced inhibition was the result of lessened sensitivity to these inhibitors. The slow isomerization phase that characterizes inhibition of the wild-type enzyme by D-xylulose-1,5-bisphosphate was completely eliminated by the mutation, and the mutant was more adept than the wild type in catalyzing the benzylic acid-type rearrangement of D-glycero-2,3-pentodiulose-1,5-bisphosphate (produced by oxidation of the substrate, D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate). These observations are consistent with increased flexibility of loop 6 induced by the mutation, and they reveal the underlying mechanisms by which the side reactions cause slow inhibition.


Received for publication, May 27, 2003 , and in revised form, June 3, 2003.

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 61-2-6125-5072; Fax: 61-2-6125-5075; E-mail: John.Andrews{at}anu.edu.au.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. M. Whitney and R. E. Sharwood
Construction of a tobacco master line to improve Rubisco engineering in chloroplasts
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1909 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H. Ashida, Y. Saito, T. Nakano, N. Tandeau de Marsac, A. Sekowska, A. Danchin, and A. Yokota
RuBisCO-like proteins as the enolase enzyme in the methionine salvage pathway: functional and evolutionary relationships between RuBisCO-like proteins and photosynthetic RuBisCO
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1543 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
I. Andersson
Catalysis and regulation in Rubisco
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1555 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. A. J. Parry, A. J. Keys, P. J. Madgwick, A. E. Carmo-Silva, and P. J. Andralojc
Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1569 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. B. McNevin, M. R. Badger, S. M. Whitney, S. von Caemmerer, G. G. B. Tcherkez, and G. D. Farquhar
Differences in Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Three Variants of D-Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Reflect Differences in Their Catalytic Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 36068 - 36076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. McNevin, S. von Caemmerer, and G. Farquhar
Determining RuBisCO activation kinetics and other rate and equilibrium constants by simultaneous multiple non-linear regression of a kinetic model
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3883 - 3900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. G. B. Tcherkez, G. D. Farquhar, and T. J. Andrews
From the Cover: Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized
PNAS, May 9, 2006; 103(19): 7246 - 7251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement