Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M304482200 on July 29, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 41, 39773-39781, October 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/41/39773    most recent
M304482200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, P. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Resistance of the Human {beta}1-Adrenergic Receptor to Agonist-mediated Down-regulation

ROLE OF THE C TERMINUS IN DETERMINING {beta}-SUBTYPE DEGRADATION*

Wei Liang, Steven Austin {ddagger}, Quang Hoang and Peter H. Fishman §

From the Membrane Biochemistry Section, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Prolonged agonist stimulation results in down-regulation of most G protein-coupled receptors. When we exposed baby hamster kidney cells stably expressing the human {beta}1-adrenergic receptor ({beta}1AR) to agonist over a 24-h period, we instead observed an increase of ~30% in both {beta}1AR binding activity and immune-detected receptors. In contrast, {beta}2AR expressed in these cells exhibited a decrease of >=50%. We determined that the basal turnover rates of the two subtypes were similar (t1/2 ~ 7 h) and that agonist stimulation increased {beta}2AR but not {beta}1AR turnover. Blocking receptor trafficking to lysosomes with bafilomycin A1 had no effect on basal turnover of either subtype but blocked agonist-stimulated {beta}2AR turnover. As {beta}1AR mRNA levels increased in agonist-stimulated cells, {beta}1AR up-regulation appeared to result from increased synthesis with no change in degradation. To explore the basis for the subtype differences, we expressed chimeras in which the C termini had been exchanged. Each chimera responded to persistent agonist stimulation based on the source of its C-tail; {beta}1AR with a {beta}2AR C-tail underwent down-regulation, and {beta}2AR with a {beta}1AR C-tail underwent up-regulation. The C-tails had a corresponding effect on agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation and internalization with the order being {beta}2AR > {beta}1AR with {beta}2AR C-tail > {beta}2AR with a {beta}1AR C-tail > {beta}1AR. As internalization may be a prerequisite for down-regulation, we addressed this possibility by co-expressing each subtype with arrestin-2. Although {beta}1AR internalization was increased to that of {beta}2AR, down-regulation still did not occur. Instead, {beta}1AR accumulated inside the cells. We conclude that in unstimulated cells, both subtypes appear to be turned over by the same mechanism. Upon agonist stimulation, both subtypes are internalized, and {beta}2AR but not {beta}1AR undergoes lysosomal degradation, the fate of each subtype being regulated by determinants in its C-tail.


Received for publication, April 29, 2003 , and in revised form, July 21, 2003.

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

{ddagger} Present address: Dept. of Psychology, State University of Arizona, Tempe, AZ 85287.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 49, Rm. 2A28, 49 Convent Dr., MSC4440, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4440. Tel.: 301-496-1325; Fax: 301-496-8244; E-mail: fishmanp{at}ninds.nih.gov.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Liang and P. H. Fishman
Resistance of the Human {beta}1-Adrenergic Receptor to Agonist-induced Ubiquitination: A MECHANISM FOR IMPAIRED RECEPTOR DEGRADATION
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46882 - 46889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Debaigt, H. Hirling, P. Steiner, J.-P. Vincent, and J. Mazella
Crucial Role of Neuron-enriched Endosomal Protein of 21 kDa in Sorting between Degradation and Recycling of Internalized G-protein-coupled Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 35687 - 35691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement