|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M307182200 on August 9, 2003
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 42, 40702-40709, October 17, 2003
Roles for an Epo Receptor Tyr-343 Stat5 Pathway in Proliferative Co-signaling with Kit*
Ke Li,
Chris Miller,
Shailajia Hegde and
Don Wojchowski
From the
Immunobiology Program and Department of Veterinary Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Erythroid progenitor cell expansion depends upon co-signaling by Epo receptor (EpoR) and Kit, but underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. To quantitatively analyze EpoR contributions to co-signaling, phosphotyrosine (Tyr(P)) mutants were expressed as human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) receptor-mEpoR EE chimeras at matched and physiological levels in FDCW2 hematopoietic progenitor cells and were assayed for proliferative activities in the absence or presence of endogenous Kit stimulation. Two Tyr(P)-null (but Jak2-coupled) EpoR forms each retained 25% of the wild-type activity, whereas the add-back of single Tyr(P) sites in the EpoR forms EE-T-Y343 (Stat5 binding site), EE-Y479 (p85/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase binding site), or EE-Y464 (Src kinase binding site) significantly enhanced activities (to 100, 95, and 50% of EE-WT (wild type) levels, respectively). EE-Y343&Y401 and EEF343&F401 double add-back and deletion constructs were also prepared and were shown to possess 90 and 50% of wild-type activity. In contrast, efficient Kit co-signaling activity was retained only by EE-T-Y343 and EE-Y343&Y401 EpoR forms. EE-T-Y343 together with EE-T-Y343F and EE-WT EpoR forms were also analyzed in embryonic stem cell-derived erythroid G1E-2 cells with highly comparable outcomes, including the ability of EE-T-Y343 (but not EE-T-Y-343F) to synergize with Kit. Despite specific connection of EE-T-Y343 to Stat5, the contributions of Kit to EpoR-dependent proliferation did not involve Kit effects on Stat5 activation (but was limited by the mutation of Kit Tyr(P)-567 and Tyr(P)-569 Src kinase recruitment sites). Instead, co-signaling appears to depend upon the downstream integration of Kit signals with the targets of an EpoR/Jak2/Y343/Stat 5 response axis.
Received for publication, July 5, 2003
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1s HL44491 and DK40242 (to D. M. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 115 Henning Bldg., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. Tel.: 814-863-8329; Fax: 814-863-6140; E-mail: dmw1{at}psu.edu.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Menon, J. Fang, and D. M. Wojchowski
Core erythropoietin receptor signals for late erythroblast development
Blood,
April 1, 2006;
107(7):
2662 - 2672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Buchse, H. Prietzsch, T. Sasse, S. Korbel, G. Stigge, S. Bogdanow, J. Brock, and T. Bittorf
Profiling of Early Gene Expression Induced by Erythropoietin Receptor Structural Variants
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 24, 2006;
281(12):
7697 - 7707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Munugalavadla, L. C. Dore, B. L. Tan, L. Hong, M. Vishnu, M. J. Weiss, and R. Kapur
Repression of c-Kit and Its Downstream Substrates by GATA-1 Inhibits Cell Proliferation during Erythroid Maturation
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2005;
25(15):
6747 - 6759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|